I respect the position. I did decide to re-register to vote as 'unaffiliated' so I could go and write in "Neither choice is acceptable" on the ballot. Felt less passive but result is same as not voting.
Do you pay your taxes that are used TO FUND the war criminals whether or not you voted for them? Most of us (me included, me especially) pay our taxes because we don't want to pay the REAL price of resistance. Snowden and Assange paid the price of standing for principle, the rest of us maybe sleep in on election day and try to live with our conscience because we really haven't done much
I will say. My whole life I was pretty much OK with paying my taxes. Mostly because we had great public schools and the modest income kids in my demographic got great, near private school level, public school education, based on taxes. I'm not that materialistic and don't mind my taxes going to educate my neighbors' kids (who I know). Each generation takes turn trying to launch the next. Of course it is in the context of community (something they've been trying to destroy) and common culture and values (another thing they've been trying to destroy in the Great Balkanization).
But all that has been eroding and changing radically and I was getting more disenchanted with taxes, because of a growing awareness that it was being weaponized AGAINST us rather than creating the wonderful schools and neighborhood I remember.
There are a million things we could all bitch about, BUT, what clinched it for me was being attacked by a bio weapon and the murderous follow up of the response ALL DONE WITH OUR TAXES.
Drop a nuke on the peeps and don't expect they'll ever be complacent again.
In those moments I went from a somewhat disenchanted but resigned adherent of
"taxes is the price we pay for a civil livable society"
TO
Tax is theft.
The government DOES NOT get to try and bio murder us while saying "it's for the greater good" and expect us to be OKY DOKY with being extorted of our money. We may lab rats, and we may be pretty dumb lab rats sometimes
But we ain't THAT dumb.
Even the lab rats know that tax is theft when it is being used to kill them
I think I heard Trump talking about this on the Joe Rogan interview or something (not this guy but along the same lines as this guy). I think he threw it out there that Federal taxes are illegal and should be abolished and replaced by tariffs (or something like that). Of course since he's not the dictator they insist he would be he has ZERO chance of abolishing the IRS. Most of his time sadly will probably be spent by the weaponized deep state DOJ (including the FBI & CIA) so the IRS will be a problem to be avoided.
Perhaps I got groggy or heard it in my sleep (it was 3 hours & I often put these things on then fall to sleep) but I could swear I heard him talking about it. It was stunning and refreshing to hear such things coming from a presidential candidate. They say he doesn't read and is not curious about things like philosophy and the constitution but he's obviously done SOME constitution thinking. A lot of the attacks on Trump about not being an "intellectual" is just intellectual elitism anyway. Because he's actually done stuff he's had to think real hard about LOTS of things that others only approach intellectually.
As Mark Twain said, “If voting mattered, they wouldn’t let us do it.” Just told a friend yesterday voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil. It’s all Theatre of The Absurd to me.
Reminds me of a meme I may have seen on your stack…NPC w a mask on and syringes stuck all over…Govern Me Harder Daddy. 😂😂😂 Thanks for sharing boldly Miss Sarah! 🙏 You’re certainly not alone. Love to you too. 💖💖💖
I think voting validates the entire corrupt system. As long as we participate in the rigged system that they created and where they control both candidates, they decide who will win, and it doesn't matter anyway because both candidates agree on what matters to them (herd-culling vaccines and Israel), we can never win. I am with you!
Paying our taxes is even a bigger validation than voting because if we did not fund the SOBs it would be hard for them to fund things like very expensive mk-ultra psyop murder technology or Gain Of Function murder programs and the thousands of other things that provide "good jobs" for thousands but ultimately have little purpose other than mass murder &/or mass control.. As long as we fund the criminals they really don't give a crap about our vote. The price for NOT funding as "a matter of principle" is very steep indeed. When it comes to funding it gets sticky because it may be our job that gets nuked.. It is ever more sticky in a technocratic world because there are good livings to be made creating the technology of mass murder. I'm certainly not ready to stop paying my taxes but am outraged along with everyone else about what's being done with it.
It appears their system runs on printing money out of thin air and making $Billions$ vanish down a hole, leaving no trace. Leaving us to b e l i e v e we hold the rains by way of taxes and voting, as this post perfectly lays out. We will realize the whole mirage in short order, when they step in to not just extort taxes from us, but rob us of all of our belongings and savings outright.
Right. I severed a lucrative 3 year contract and put the energy into turning my property into a more self-sustaining arrangement. Minimized my bank exposure, shifted investments into tangible assets. Goals: sustainable production, bartering, cash transactions and staying below the taxable bracket. A huge adjustment on a less than 100% suitable frame, needed some compromises, but no longer working for ‘them’. Max resistance without having to resort to jail.
Whatever revenues they don't collect (for whatever reason) they make up for by borrowing from private banksters, at interest. Meanwhile, they take your property/throw you in jail, whatever. So I doubt that refusing to pay taxes is the solution.
There are very few solutions. Only half measure mitigations and "making a statement". Only solution is to make better more moral people which is an ongoing failure prone project that seems to run in cycles between "people are really bad, greedy and selfish" to "people are really really really bad, greedy and selfish". Best you can hope (in my opinion) is to keep slogging and do your part to make things better and hope you're lucky enough to not be living in those "interesting times" from the famous curse "may you live in interesting times"
Because economic justice should be the bedrock of a country's laws, not something that has to have a majority of voters vote for it (even if the votes were getting counted accurately)
Not to mention what the reptilians intend, UN agenda 2030, CBDC, digital I.Ds, 15 min cities, the whole globohomo NWO construct, replacement illegal alien invasion etc etc.
uggggh.... can you think of a more accurate description of the psychopaths than, 'reptilians' - which are creatures of Nature whereas psychopaths and sociopaths and cyborgs are not?
reptiles are cold blooded. Whether creatures of nature or not reptiles are often used historically and in fiction to represent evil. If you can think of a better description then please advise.
I reckon what it boils down to is the need to take a closer look at our understanding of ‘Democracy’. What we will likely find is that it has been sold to us on a pedestal, adorned with a halo which everyone has adopted as the highest measure of political virtue. 2020 should have made it cristal clear, to whom pays attention, that it caters to the hijacking of personal rights and social rule by way of indoctrinated and apathetic masses psyopped by psychological mind warfare. And is the onramp into Marxism unless diligently garded. We cannot drop our shackles using the tools provided by those keeping us hostage.
I think the best thing most people can say is that freedom is defined by having a limited government. Limited means limited. Well defined. Do not let wiggle room for the executive to make inventions. Which means there should not be socialist programs, like public health, public education, espionage everywhere without a warrant, etc. The old ideal of a government of things and not of people. It should be acceptable for most, because most people are not sociopaths, and because freedom means that law enforcement and courts should work autonomously, independent of political whims and machinations. And because in a freedom system the people who do better get more and the people who do worse get less, and criminals are decimated. Freedom is not safe for criminals.
But some people want privileges and guaranteed business and profits. They hate freedom too, like criminals, even if they are not criminals.
How could ever be banks, pharmaceutical companies and insurance companies like today, in a fredom-based system?
Great summary of the president's since Reagan. The only way I can communicate my displeasure for both major parties is to NOT vote. This absurd idea that I MUST vote for someone who stands in opposition to nearly everything that I believe is good and right is insane.
I hope you include Reagan in 'since Reagan.' He was one of the worst 'actors' in the system, setting precedent for what we now have - which is a big fat nothing - and people are still eating up the lies and thinking a political 'savior' from the UniCorporateParty will save us.
We may not consent but we submit every time we pay taxes because regardless how we vote they'll forcefully and cheerfully take our money and spend it to murder anyone they want including us and do whatever they want whether we voted for it or not. In that respect (just my opinion) the more we can drop out (like the Amish for example) and the more we use harder to tax cash the more we say "I want no part of this". We still have every right to conduct charity etc but it also gives us the right to opt out of things like "gender affirming" genital removal for minors which is sold as "charitable" and king.
For the record. I did not recall Trump saying he'd get rid of income taxes in the Joe Rogan interview. As I recall (now I have to go review:) it was just a free wheeling conversation about the whole concept, purpose and constitutionality of Federal Income taxes. He probably has promised to LOWER Federal Income taxes in campaign mode, but I doubt he's ever said he would get rid of Federal income tax. But repeal of the Federal income tax law IS a rather nice fantasy. But not happening any time soon
They want to get rid of the whole idea of local and community and force you to think global about made up extortion scams like carbon credits.
I agree we need to work on the exorbitant state taxes. Particularly in People's Republic Sanctuary states like where I live. They just come right out and tell you that your taxes are more justly spent on invaders than on your neighbors. So much for the concept of local and community. In the past I would have been more wobbly on the proposition excess reduction because most property tax where I grew up went to schools and we had really great safe schools. But at this point it is CLEARLY out of whack and those alleged school taxes are being used to fund some pretty damaging things.
But all that has changed and is continuing to change. What the state did to public schools during COVID revealed to many of us just what is going on if we had not been in touch in a while. Much as it seems like a pain beginning to look like home schooling &/or private schools that have at least some sane policies is the better option. At the very least you can put them in a environment where out of the gate they don't brow beat you to put your kids in the clot shot and vax schedule lottery. That issue along is disqualifying for public schools in my opinion. The public schools have become indoctrination zones (perhaps they always were) and the worst in my opinion was they were tip of the spear in pushing for clot shots, masking, social distancing and of course the whole LBGTQ+ / Trans agenda. But it is hard to send our kids to alternative schools that reflect saner values and avoid the state sponsored nonsense if they extort your private school money in property taxes.
The change is so radical and so fast that even though I've lived here for decades seems every few months I walk out the door where I live and have that "where the hell am I?" feeling both culturally and atmospheric.
Lots of immigrants around here which is OK in principle, mostly nice people but sometimes I get the feeling they feel less displaced than the natives because they have no background expectation. This is not home to them. It may become home but it isn't yet. I know lots of transplants who've lived here decades and are thinking of retiring "back home" and it is a wistful thought because "back home" is hardly even a concept for many. They ARE home and home is kinda gone. When home no longer feels like home even though you never left it it produces lots of cognitive dissonance. It is not even a matter of going away and coming back. It's a matter of waking up every day in the same place to face a continuously less recognizable place.. You'd think that staying put would shield one from that shock but it doesn't. The pace of change is so fast and so radical you can't keep up
I could list so many things but one that always leaves me stunned is, ...
I never could have imagined that in what seems like a rather short period of time I'd wake up in a culture where government paid government approved and government enabled/encouraged genital removal would be viewed as gender "affirming". We even have candidates promising foreigners, "come to America and we'll hack off your genitals for free".
HUH! Did I miss something?
When did Mengele go from being the icon of Evil to sexy and in vogue? I thought I could depend on mutilation as a bad thing as reliably as Holocaust bad, Nazi Bad, Hitler bad. Turns out you can't rely on any fundamental truths. They're all up for re-interpretation. To the point that if you question it you're some how evil. There are other examples but that one ...??? I can't keep up. Nor do I care to keep up.
No vote is a vote for the status quo. You like the status quo?
Additionally, Trump at least defunded the WHO and is probably going to defund the UN too if elected. Why not support that, or vote down ballot for those that are fighting the system? Not voting doesn't change anything and gives you zero voice.
Very good article, Whitney Webb had also done extensive research on this too. It’s a huge web of corruption and deception that the masses who scream their support for are oblivious. We have definitely entered the Twilight Zone.
We don't have elections, we have selections. Your voted is to decide if brand Red or brand Blue gets to choose the people who will select the Electorates who choose from the two. You are not allowed to choose your leaders, they are chosen for you. Rules for Electorates vary from State to State.
I’m with you Sarah! The older I get the more I come to understand that the history of history is governments committing atrocities against its citizens. Since history is always written by the winners we rarely come to understand how deep the lies go! Thank you!
THANK YOU! this got me off the fence. was heading to give trump my vote, but the thought kept me nauseous.
you are so right not to give further way to the gatekeepers!
they are all criminals.
i will vote locally, and for good reps state&federal, but NOBODY for president.
NOBODY!
fractuous times ahead for us all, all you good people spend the next few months making your best efforts to be prepared with security, food and water ~ stay safe ~ stand down and off radar throughout whatever comes next in the next few months til the initial dust settles and vision ahead appears more clearly.
BLESSINGS ALL ~ DO YOUR BEST TO DO NO HARM AND CARE FOR YOUR FAMILIES AND FRIENDS💗
Wishing for a Pat Buchanan or Thomas Massie. I would even vote for Sarah Palin. But in my lifetime the fix has always been in.
When the last sham was questioned by a whole bunch of states the Supreme Court said nah go away. What a joke of a country. It’s mafia level rackets all the way down, not turtles, rackets.
It seems to me, and I do not think you could find anyone as cynical as me, that you approach leaves something to be desired. I understand as well as anyone here the deep state of corruption that we are in. I understand the players and I understand the futility of thinking that you can "vote one's way out of tyranny." I do not buy the James Corbett and Whitney Webb drink of being anti-Hopium. It sounds cute, but it get tedious---as much as I applaud both for other wake-up instructions they've given. I am not "hopeful" in the way that they pronounce all voters to be. And, please, I am not voting from some sophomoric notion of "the lesser fo two evils." I am making a voting calculation based upon which of my feared outcomes I think that I can live with for long enough to do some good. Not voting is not a good strategy for our "anti-tyranny coalition against the Uniparty and the Garks.
Looking through the comments, I was afraid there wasn’t going to be a voice of reason, but then I saw your comment, a lone voice in the wilderness. Are you as puzzled as I am by people who say that by not voting they are withholding their “consent” to be governed. How does that work exactly? A previous commenter said they had never felt so free. Do they think the government goes through a list of non-voters and removes them from the tax rolls, and do they imagine they can ignore other laws they may find objectionable or inconvenient because they haven’t given their “consent” to be governed? I suggest they test this hypothesis the next time a state cop pulls them over for doing 75 in a 55. I wonder how they think he would respond to their claim that he has no jurisdiction over them because they didn’t vote and thus did not “consent” to be governed.
It’s also odd that people who value the the 1st amendment wouldn’t, at least, vote against an administration who has demonstrated they very much want to remove “misinformation”, as defined by the administration, from all platforms. If they are successful, this post we are commenting on would likely never see the light of day.
People can think what they want about the Uniparty, and I’m not saying it doesn’t exist, but there is no way the two candidates currently vying for the highest office are playing for the same team. There is some type of battle playing out and whether it is between good and evil or two different factions of evil remains to be seen but one thing is certain, regardless of those who may claim otherwise, no one who is on the outside looking in can know, with certainty, which of those two battles is playing out.
For an interesting take on the topic, I just read an interesting post from Mark Bisone, “A Blackpilled Guide to Voting” here on Substack. Somewhat tongue in cheek, but he makes some interesting points.
Dear "Not That Karen," you expressed this matter beautifully and thoroughly. Not voting is just one little form of submissiveness that they want people to exhibit and yield to. Not voting is a form of malignant obedience. These "oh-so-defiant" voters are generally just giving themselves a weak excuse for their laziness. Using their same rationale of ineffectiveness, NOT voting is even more ineffective. Thanks. This was a keeper comment.
Dear Wilson, can you clarify. I cannot figure out which was you old position and which is your new position. Can you explain the reasoning for your switch?
I am tired of all the lies, greed, warmongering, corruption, lawfare, the fed, pharma med complex, CRT, D.I.E. marxist takeover of the military, illegal alien invasion, israel first, career politicians, a pedophile dementia patient potus, leviathan government, lgbtq, trannies, race hustlers, captured msm, three letter agencies that are out of control, murder and debilitating injury by injection, hate for western civilization, 35 trillion debt and much more. I am done with all of it.
Dear Wilson, Re: "I am tired of all the . . . " I could hardly agree with you more. There is the problem. Now, I will ask you (a rhetorical question only): "What is the solution?" Awakening others--as you are doing--is indeed important.
If I understand you correctly, and I think I do, your question--a very good one--is directed toward a question of the properties of the elected official's governing actions vis-à-vis their prior campaign promises and whether the former (as those stuffy philosophers say) supervene upon the the latter, that is, the campaign promises. And if not, what can guide one's vote if there is no causal relationship between promise and in-office activities. This is where the person's character and prior hints of how they might--in general--govern. Donald Trump has definitely disappointed in this sense. However, Kamala Harris seems to participate in governance in ways that do not surprise me and in ways that I object to. Thus, I reject her candidacy in favor of a problematic and sometimes unpredictable Trump. That is, I hope you can see, NOT a simple "lesser fo two evils" calculus.
Your calculation will probably not have an effect on the outcome. Both major parties are now in Schrodinger's Electrically Counted Ballot Box...one will survive and 'win', dependant on and subject to the needs of the electricians who have wired our system. My personal voting booth is crowded by Jill Stein and Smedley Butler. Neither will be elected, but one sends a quantum of living anti-genocide, anti-Uniparty energy into the environment. But Smedley's so cool, so...?
Sorry, I was trying to answer your reply during an intermission in a zoom call. I almost misunderstood your remark regarding ". . . a quantum of living anti-genocide, anti-Uniparty energy." Well, that is too woo-woo (please forgive that rapidly-becoming hackneyed term). There is the practical action of meeting others at the polling place, encouraging others and being encouraged by the long lines for your candidate---as I experienced in 2016. But, yes, yes, yes, the electoral activity is not sufficient and it becomes less sufficient when we do nothing in between elections. Politics is too important to leave to politicians. It is OUR job to fix the culture using all of the powers available to us: conversation, economical, entrepreneurial, educational, political, . . . coaching baseball, and on and on. And if you are so inclined, remember to pray. Thanks.
Sir or Madam, I can count. I spend my days often dealing with probablities and reading statistics. Your comment, ". . . a quantum of living anti-genocide, anti-Uniparty energy into the environment," is colorful, but it has no practical meaning.
My comment wasn't about arithmetic, but about a rigged system that is not currently subject to being influenced by our individual participation...at least not on the presidential level. (Just saw your longer reply get posted...no offense taken here on the woo woo categorization...but if prayer has any practical meaning for you, maybe reconsider the practical & spiritual value of voting for somone who isn't promising to give Israel whatever it needs to 'git 'er done'...it certainly won't stop the slaughter, but it might be beneficial in some personal way going forward...and, yeah, do what you can with your local school board & city council...they're influencable.)
Yes, prayer does have meaning to me and I do pray for the Gazan people everyday. If you have seen by Substack page, you will see my recent writings on the matter which appear to be the basis of Twitter blacking me out from even accessing Twitter/X. I opt to burden Kamala Harris with genocide now given the Biden Administration's support for Israel and her claim that she has been intimately involved in his governing decisions. (Whether that is true, or how true it is, is going to have to go unresolved.) Trump's words, I agree, were horrible on this recently--its the campaign cash. Not because he is a deep moralist, but because of his worldly, pragmatic view of building and dealing, he seems to be averse to wars. I think there is some chance that DJT, once in office, will pull the plug on bombing Gaza. I base this on the admittedly vulnerable conjecture on my part that given DJT's frank admission that, in his meeting with Bibi in the past, that it was DJT's realization that Netanyahu did not want peace when it was available. I am praying that DJT disappoints Mrs. Adelson. But, believe me, I am very aware of what we both can see as an alarming set of data re: DJT and U.S. policy towards Israel. See my discussion with the Academic Agent in my Notes section. So, for me, a vote for Harris is a vote to kill more Palestinians, Lebanese and Iranians (not an exhaustive list). To circle back to my original reply to the Conspiracy Sarah, the author of this site, TO NOT VOTE AS A PROTEST IS AS MINISCULE IN EFFECTIVENESS AS VOTING IN TERMS OF ELECTORAL POWER---THE OTHER BENEFITS OF VOTING WHICH I BELIEVE ARE REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL (HUMANS ARE ENCOURAGED BY GROUP EMULATION). Plus, voting, added up, I do believe is important in the collective count, even considering its unreliability. People and groups either not voting, or white women voting for Obama, unleashed a lot of misery--perhaps irreversible--on the nation. I never have much respect for the act of counselling others to not vote. I will save my strong words for that. Thank you infanttyron3 and thank you Conspiracy Sarah for this thread.
Yep, I wrote in Ron Paul for several elections for that very reason. My protest counted for squat.
Only when I finally stopped voting for someone to rule over me, did I start to feel what real freedom is supposed to feel like. Check out Gary D. Barnett's incisive writing on the subject, a real eyeball opener.
Write in for executive and legislator positions with no good options,
"I, DO NOT CONSENT"
They no longer have the consent of the governed, of We the People. We don't vote for puppets while being stolen from.
Want to really mess with their algorithms, return all you purchased in the last day, last week, last month. Imagine if only 5% of us did it. And then, did not buy for a day, a week, a month.
I'm with you, Sarah!
I DO NOT VOTE FOR WAR CRIMINALS AND MASS MURDERERS.
Yup, me three.
I respect the position. I did decide to re-register to vote as 'unaffiliated' so I could go and write in "Neither choice is acceptable" on the ballot. Felt less passive but result is same as not voting.
Not a wasted vote at all. It shows you do not consent. See my post as that is crucially a vote “against” not a vote “for”.
Do you pay your taxes that are used TO FUND the war criminals whether or not you voted for them? Most of us (me included, me especially) pay our taxes because we don't want to pay the REAL price of resistance. Snowden and Assange paid the price of standing for principle, the rest of us maybe sleep in on election day and try to live with our conscience because we really haven't done much
I can neither confirm nor deny such things. =)
While not confirming or denying:)...
I will say. My whole life I was pretty much OK with paying my taxes. Mostly because we had great public schools and the modest income kids in my demographic got great, near private school level, public school education, based on taxes. I'm not that materialistic and don't mind my taxes going to educate my neighbors' kids (who I know). Each generation takes turn trying to launch the next. Of course it is in the context of community (something they've been trying to destroy) and common culture and values (another thing they've been trying to destroy in the Great Balkanization).
But all that has been eroding and changing radically and I was getting more disenchanted with taxes, because of a growing awareness that it was being weaponized AGAINST us rather than creating the wonderful schools and neighborhood I remember.
There are a million things we could all bitch about, BUT, what clinched it for me was being attacked by a bio weapon and the murderous follow up of the response ALL DONE WITH OUR TAXES.
Drop a nuke on the peeps and don't expect they'll ever be complacent again.
In those moments I went from a somewhat disenchanted but resigned adherent of
"taxes is the price we pay for a civil livable society"
TO
Tax is theft.
The government DOES NOT get to try and bio murder us while saying "it's for the greater good" and expect us to be OKY DOKY with being extorted of our money. We may lab rats, and we may be pretty dumb lab rats sometimes
But we ain't THAT dumb.
Even the lab rats know that tax is theft when it is being used to kill them
https://odysee.com/@KimIversen:d/this-man-says-he-legally-hasn't-paid:6
This Man Says He LEGALLY Hasn't Paid Federal Taxes In Over 30 Years, “They Are Unconstitutional”
I think I heard Trump talking about this on the Joe Rogan interview or something (not this guy but along the same lines as this guy). I think he threw it out there that Federal taxes are illegal and should be abolished and replaced by tariffs (or something like that). Of course since he's not the dictator they insist he would be he has ZERO chance of abolishing the IRS. Most of his time sadly will probably be spent by the weaponized deep state DOJ (including the FBI & CIA) so the IRS will be a problem to be avoided.
Perhaps I got groggy or heard it in my sleep (it was 3 hours & I often put these things on then fall to sleep) but I could swear I heard him talking about it. It was stunning and refreshing to hear such things coming from a presidential candidate. They say he doesn't read and is not curious about things like philosophy and the constitution but he's obviously done SOME constitution thinking. A lot of the attacks on Trump about not being an "intellectual" is just intellectual elitism anyway. Because he's actually done stuff he's had to think real hard about LOTS of things that others only approach intellectually.
Consent is needed to tax us & pass laws.
True but it's kept a secret. Meanwhile the order of the day is
YOU WILL CONSENT! Else we'll take all you have and toss you in jail
If you're lucky
Same here.
Thank you!
As Mark Twain said, “If voting mattered, they wouldn’t let us do it.” Just told a friend yesterday voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil. It’s all Theatre of The Absurd to me.
Reminds me of a meme I may have seen on your stack…NPC w a mask on and syringes stuck all over…Govern Me Harder Daddy. 😂😂😂 Thanks for sharing boldly Miss Sarah! 🙏 You’re certainly not alone. Love to you too. 💖💖💖
I think voting validates the entire corrupt system. As long as we participate in the rigged system that they created and where they control both candidates, they decide who will win, and it doesn't matter anyway because both candidates agree on what matters to them (herd-culling vaccines and Israel), we can never win. I am with you!
Paying our taxes is even a bigger validation than voting because if we did not fund the SOBs it would be hard for them to fund things like very expensive mk-ultra psyop murder technology or Gain Of Function murder programs and the thousands of other things that provide "good jobs" for thousands but ultimately have little purpose other than mass murder &/or mass control.. As long as we fund the criminals they really don't give a crap about our vote. The price for NOT funding as "a matter of principle" is very steep indeed. When it comes to funding it gets sticky because it may be our job that gets nuked.. It is ever more sticky in a technocratic world because there are good livings to be made creating the technology of mass murder. I'm certainly not ready to stop paying my taxes but am outraged along with everyone else about what's being done with it.
It appears their system runs on printing money out of thin air and making $Billions$ vanish down a hole, leaving no trace. Leaving us to b e l i e v e we hold the rains by way of taxes and voting, as this post perfectly lays out. We will realize the whole mirage in short order, when they step in to not just extort taxes from us, but rob us of all of our belongings and savings outright.
I'm "READY TO STOP PAYING " and I WANT MY PAST TAXES BACK...!!!!!
Right. I severed a lucrative 3 year contract and put the energy into turning my property into a more self-sustaining arrangement. Minimized my bank exposure, shifted investments into tangible assets. Goals: sustainable production, bartering, cash transactions and staying below the taxable bracket. A huge adjustment on a less than 100% suitable frame, needed some compromises, but no longer working for ‘them’. Max resistance without having to resort to jail.
https://odysee.com/@KimIversen:d/this-is-how-you-can-stop-paying-taxes:e
This Is How You Can Stop Paying Taxes Legally, NOW!
Whatever revenues they don't collect (for whatever reason) they make up for by borrowing from private banksters, at interest. Meanwhile, they take your property/throw you in jail, whatever. So I doubt that refusing to pay taxes is the solution.
There are very few solutions. Only half measure mitigations and "making a statement". Only solution is to make better more moral people which is an ongoing failure prone project that seems to run in cycles between "people are really bad, greedy and selfish" to "people are really really really bad, greedy and selfish". Best you can hope (in my opinion) is to keep slogging and do your part to make things better and hope you're lucky enough to not be living in those "interesting times" from the famous curse "may you live in interesting times"
IMHO there's one very good solution: making sure that each household gets as much unconditional cash as Congress gives itself: https://diy.rootsaction.org/petitions/end-poverty-demand-a-ubi-equal-to-what-congress-pays-itself
Because economic justice should be the bedrock of a country's laws, not something that has to have a majority of voters vote for it (even if the votes were getting counted accurately)
Not to mention what the reptilians intend, UN agenda 2030, CBDC, digital I.Ds, 15 min cities, the whole globohomo NWO construct, replacement illegal alien invasion etc etc.
uggggh.... can you think of a more accurate description of the psychopaths than, 'reptilians' - which are creatures of Nature whereas psychopaths and sociopaths and cyborgs are not?
reptiles are cold blooded. Whether creatures of nature or not reptiles are often used historically and in fiction to represent evil. If you can think of a better description then please advise.
Great post Sarah!
Would you vote if you could cast a negative vote? That means, you vote would count as a negative 1.
that's some 4-D Chess there, Roger- and I like it !
(question is, can one un-vote multiple times...?)
I reckon what it boils down to is the need to take a closer look at our understanding of ‘Democracy’. What we will likely find is that it has been sold to us on a pedestal, adorned with a halo which everyone has adopted as the highest measure of political virtue. 2020 should have made it cristal clear, to whom pays attention, that it caters to the hijacking of personal rights and social rule by way of indoctrinated and apathetic masses psyopped by psychological mind warfare. And is the onramp into Marxism unless diligently garded. We cannot drop our shackles using the tools provided by those keeping us hostage.
I think the best thing most people can say is that freedom is defined by having a limited government. Limited means limited. Well defined. Do not let wiggle room for the executive to make inventions. Which means there should not be socialist programs, like public health, public education, espionage everywhere without a warrant, etc. The old ideal of a government of things and not of people. It should be acceptable for most, because most people are not sociopaths, and because freedom means that law enforcement and courts should work autonomously, independent of political whims and machinations. And because in a freedom system the people who do better get more and the people who do worse get less, and criminals are decimated. Freedom is not safe for criminals.
But some people want privileges and guaranteed business and profits. They hate freedom too, like criminals, even if they are not criminals.
How could ever be banks, pharmaceutical companies and insurance companies like today, in a fredom-based system?
Looking over the walls that confine our box is the way forward.
Some inspiration: The complete and undeniable Truth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=_5mZ5FBHg0A
(Larken Rose)
Great summary of the president's since Reagan. The only way I can communicate my displeasure for both major parties is to NOT vote. This absurd idea that I MUST vote for someone who stands in opposition to nearly everything that I believe is good and right is insane.
Insane indeed Jody. Cray cray, as the kids say. Not only that, it is a vast fraud covering up the really big fraud ... Caitlin says it best ...
https://open.substack.com/pub/doc115/p/the-grandest-distraction-of-all?r=18tk5o&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Best of luck,
~~ j ~~
I hope you include Reagan in 'since Reagan.' He was one of the worst 'actors' in the system, setting precedent for what we now have - which is a big fat nothing - and people are still eating up the lies and thinking a political 'savior' from the UniCorporateParty will save us.
“Do you want to eat diarrhea or vomit? It’s your choice. Make your voice heard. Exercise your right!”
Yep. 💯 🎯🙏🏻❤️😘
I DID NOT VOTE! I DO NOT CONSENT! 👉🖕The entire system is despicable and corrupt. I wash my hands of this shit show, bread and circuses!
We may not consent but we submit every time we pay taxes because regardless how we vote they'll forcefully and cheerfully take our money and spend it to murder anyone they want including us and do whatever they want whether we voted for it or not. In that respect (just my opinion) the more we can drop out (like the Amish for example) and the more we use harder to tax cash the more we say "I want no part of this". We still have every right to conduct charity etc but it also gives us the right to opt out of things like "gender affirming" genital removal for minors which is sold as "charitable" and king.
Trump says he will get rid of income tax!! Yeah right. We need to work in our states to get rid of property taxes, that would be a great start.
For the record. I did not recall Trump saying he'd get rid of income taxes in the Joe Rogan interview. As I recall (now I have to go review:) it was just a free wheeling conversation about the whole concept, purpose and constitutionality of Federal Income taxes. He probably has promised to LOWER Federal Income taxes in campaign mode, but I doubt he's ever said he would get rid of Federal income tax. But repeal of the Federal income tax law IS a rather nice fantasy. But not happening any time soon
They want to get rid of the whole idea of local and community and force you to think global about made up extortion scams like carbon credits.
I agree we need to work on the exorbitant state taxes. Particularly in People's Republic Sanctuary states like where I live. They just come right out and tell you that your taxes are more justly spent on invaders than on your neighbors. So much for the concept of local and community. In the past I would have been more wobbly on the proposition excess reduction because most property tax where I grew up went to schools and we had really great safe schools. But at this point it is CLEARLY out of whack and those alleged school taxes are being used to fund some pretty damaging things.
But all that has changed and is continuing to change. What the state did to public schools during COVID revealed to many of us just what is going on if we had not been in touch in a while. Much as it seems like a pain beginning to look like home schooling &/or private schools that have at least some sane policies is the better option. At the very least you can put them in a environment where out of the gate they don't brow beat you to put your kids in the clot shot and vax schedule lottery. That issue along is disqualifying for public schools in my opinion. The public schools have become indoctrination zones (perhaps they always were) and the worst in my opinion was they were tip of the spear in pushing for clot shots, masking, social distancing and of course the whole LBGTQ+ / Trans agenda. But it is hard to send our kids to alternative schools that reflect saner values and avoid the state sponsored nonsense if they extort your private school money in property taxes.
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Business/trump-proposes-eliminating-personal-income-taxes-work/story?id=115217463
I went to Catholic school for 12 years…what a difference! Of course I graduated in 1977 😂!
The change is so radical and so fast that even though I've lived here for decades seems every few months I walk out the door where I live and have that "where the hell am I?" feeling both culturally and atmospheric.
Lots of immigrants around here which is OK in principle, mostly nice people but sometimes I get the feeling they feel less displaced than the natives because they have no background expectation. This is not home to them. It may become home but it isn't yet. I know lots of transplants who've lived here decades and are thinking of retiring "back home" and it is a wistful thought because "back home" is hardly even a concept for many. They ARE home and home is kinda gone. When home no longer feels like home even though you never left it it produces lots of cognitive dissonance. It is not even a matter of going away and coming back. It's a matter of waking up every day in the same place to face a continuously less recognizable place.. You'd think that staying put would shield one from that shock but it doesn't. The pace of change is so fast and so radical you can't keep up
I could list so many things but one that always leaves me stunned is, ...
I never could have imagined that in what seems like a rather short period of time I'd wake up in a culture where government paid government approved and government enabled/encouraged genital removal would be viewed as gender "affirming". We even have candidates promising foreigners, "come to America and we'll hack off your genitals for free".
HUH! Did I miss something?
When did Mengele go from being the icon of Evil to sexy and in vogue? I thought I could depend on mutilation as a bad thing as reliably as Holocaust bad, Nazi Bad, Hitler bad. Turns out you can't rely on any fundamental truths. They're all up for re-interpretation. To the point that if you question it you're some how evil. There are other examples but that one ...??? I can't keep up. Nor do I care to keep up.
I pay taxes to stay out of jail. Taxes are a sin, Ray!
And I concur with you.
Agreed
I used to see taxes as a responsible charitable citizens' duty. For the obvious reasons
OBVIOUSLY I had not thought it through
NOW it's mere prison avoidance behavior
Took a bio weapon attack to get it through my skull
Tax is theft AND a sin
No vote is a vote for the status quo. You like the status quo?
Additionally, Trump at least defunded the WHO and is probably going to defund the UN too if elected. Why not support that, or vote down ballot for those that are fighting the system? Not voting doesn't change anything and gives you zero voice.
We already have zero voice. That's the whole point. Voting is the great fraud that fakes the masses into believing they have a voice.
Only when enough people stop validating a thoroughly corrupt system by voting ... will there be any hope of real change.
https://open.substack.com/pub/doc115/p/the-grandest-distraction-of-all?r=18tk5o&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Call me when we have hand counted actual paper ballots again.
Best of luck,
~~ j ~~
💥👏💥
Are you sure Trump “defunded the WHO”????
https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/vaccine-bait-switch-millions-pulled-from-who-trump-gives-billions-gates-founded-gavi/
TLV has become a TDS sufferer.
He used to be worth a listen, but not any more.
No vote, is another vote for Kamala.
It is as simple as that.
That's more brainwashing propaganda.
Sure about that?
The article is by Derrick Broze, who is quite informative and legit in my opinion.
Very good article, Whitney Webb had also done extensive research on this too. It’s a huge web of corruption and deception that the masses who scream their support for are oblivious. We have definitely entered the Twilight Zone.
I have a couple of Webb’s books. She’s a wealth of information!
We don't have elections, we have selections. Your voted is to decide if brand Red or brand Blue gets to choose the people who will select the Electorates who choose from the two. You are not allowed to choose your leaders, they are chosen for you. Rules for Electorates vary from State to State.
They won’t change their policies if they know you’ll vote them for them no matter what they do.
I’m with you Sarah! The older I get the more I come to understand that the history of history is governments committing atrocities against its citizens. Since history is always written by the winners we rarely come to understand how deep the lies go! Thank you!
THANK YOU! this got me off the fence. was heading to give trump my vote, but the thought kept me nauseous.
you are so right not to give further way to the gatekeepers!
they are all criminals.
i will vote locally, and for good reps state&federal, but NOBODY for president.
NOBODY!
fractuous times ahead for us all, all you good people spend the next few months making your best efforts to be prepared with security, food and water ~ stay safe ~ stand down and off radar throughout whatever comes next in the next few months til the initial dust settles and vision ahead appears more clearly.
BLESSINGS ALL ~ DO YOUR BEST TO DO NO HARM AND CARE FOR YOUR FAMILIES AND FRIENDS💗
Wishing for a Pat Buchanan or Thomas Massie. I would even vote for Sarah Palin. But in my lifetime the fix has always been in.
When the last sham was questioned by a whole bunch of states the Supreme Court said nah go away. What a joke of a country. It’s mafia level rackets all the way down, not turtles, rackets.
It seems to me, and I do not think you could find anyone as cynical as me, that you approach leaves something to be desired. I understand as well as anyone here the deep state of corruption that we are in. I understand the players and I understand the futility of thinking that you can "vote one's way out of tyranny." I do not buy the James Corbett and Whitney Webb drink of being anti-Hopium. It sounds cute, but it get tedious---as much as I applaud both for other wake-up instructions they've given. I am not "hopeful" in the way that they pronounce all voters to be. And, please, I am not voting from some sophomoric notion of "the lesser fo two evils." I am making a voting calculation based upon which of my feared outcomes I think that I can live with for long enough to do some good. Not voting is not a good strategy for our "anti-tyranny coalition against the Uniparty and the Garks.
Looking through the comments, I was afraid there wasn’t going to be a voice of reason, but then I saw your comment, a lone voice in the wilderness. Are you as puzzled as I am by people who say that by not voting they are withholding their “consent” to be governed. How does that work exactly? A previous commenter said they had never felt so free. Do they think the government goes through a list of non-voters and removes them from the tax rolls, and do they imagine they can ignore other laws they may find objectionable or inconvenient because they haven’t given their “consent” to be governed? I suggest they test this hypothesis the next time a state cop pulls them over for doing 75 in a 55. I wonder how they think he would respond to their claim that he has no jurisdiction over them because they didn’t vote and thus did not “consent” to be governed.
It’s also odd that people who value the the 1st amendment wouldn’t, at least, vote against an administration who has demonstrated they very much want to remove “misinformation”, as defined by the administration, from all platforms. If they are successful, this post we are commenting on would likely never see the light of day.
People can think what they want about the Uniparty, and I’m not saying it doesn’t exist, but there is no way the two candidates currently vying for the highest office are playing for the same team. There is some type of battle playing out and whether it is between good and evil or two different factions of evil remains to be seen but one thing is certain, regardless of those who may claim otherwise, no one who is on the outside looking in can know, with certainty, which of those two battles is playing out.
For an interesting take on the topic, I just read an interesting post from Mark Bisone, “A Blackpilled Guide to Voting” here on Substack. Somewhat tongue in cheek, but he makes some interesting points.
Dear "Not That Karen," you expressed this matter beautifully and thoroughly. Not voting is just one little form of submissiveness that they want people to exhibit and yield to. Not voting is a form of malignant obedience. These "oh-so-defiant" voters are generally just giving themselves a weak excuse for their laziness. Using their same rationale of ineffectiveness, NOT voting is even more ineffective. Thanks. This was a keeper comment.
that is one take and an understandable one. I thought that way too, once.
Dear Wilson, can you clarify. I cannot figure out which was you old position and which is your new position. Can you explain the reasoning for your switch?
I am tired of all the lies, greed, warmongering, corruption, lawfare, the fed, pharma med complex, CRT, D.I.E. marxist takeover of the military, illegal alien invasion, israel first, career politicians, a pedophile dementia patient potus, leviathan government, lgbtq, trannies, race hustlers, captured msm, three letter agencies that are out of control, murder and debilitating injury by injection, hate for western civilization, 35 trillion debt and much more. I am done with all of it.
https://www.brighteon.com/339c284b-427f-4f63-ad11-0bd4b5f80191
ameshowardkunstler.substack.com/p/kunstlercast-412?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=2076970&post_id=150948576&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=yvlke&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
Dear Wilson, Re: "I am tired of all the . . . " I could hardly agree with you more. There is the problem. Now, I will ask you (a rhetorical question only): "What is the solution?" Awakening others--as you are doing--is indeed important.
How can we know the outcome of either presidential selection? Is the expected outcome based on campaign promises?
If I understand you correctly, and I think I do, your question--a very good one--is directed toward a question of the properties of the elected official's governing actions vis-à-vis their prior campaign promises and whether the former (as those stuffy philosophers say) supervene upon the the latter, that is, the campaign promises. And if not, what can guide one's vote if there is no causal relationship between promise and in-office activities. This is where the person's character and prior hints of how they might--in general--govern. Donald Trump has definitely disappointed in this sense. However, Kamala Harris seems to participate in governance in ways that do not surprise me and in ways that I object to. Thus, I reject her candidacy in favor of a problematic and sometimes unpredictable Trump. That is, I hope you can see, NOT a simple "lesser fo two evils" calculus.
Your calculation will probably not have an effect on the outcome. Both major parties are now in Schrodinger's Electrically Counted Ballot Box...one will survive and 'win', dependant on and subject to the needs of the electricians who have wired our system. My personal voting booth is crowded by Jill Stein and Smedley Butler. Neither will be elected, but one sends a quantum of living anti-genocide, anti-Uniparty energy into the environment. But Smedley's so cool, so...?
Sorry, I was trying to answer your reply during an intermission in a zoom call. I almost misunderstood your remark regarding ". . . a quantum of living anti-genocide, anti-Uniparty energy." Well, that is too woo-woo (please forgive that rapidly-becoming hackneyed term). There is the practical action of meeting others at the polling place, encouraging others and being encouraged by the long lines for your candidate---as I experienced in 2016. But, yes, yes, yes, the electoral activity is not sufficient and it becomes less sufficient when we do nothing in between elections. Politics is too important to leave to politicians. It is OUR job to fix the culture using all of the powers available to us: conversation, economical, entrepreneurial, educational, political, . . . coaching baseball, and on and on. And if you are so inclined, remember to pray. Thanks.
Sir or Madam, I can count. I spend my days often dealing with probablities and reading statistics. Your comment, ". . . a quantum of living anti-genocide, anti-Uniparty energy into the environment," is colorful, but it has no practical meaning.
My comment wasn't about arithmetic, but about a rigged system that is not currently subject to being influenced by our individual participation...at least not on the presidential level. (Just saw your longer reply get posted...no offense taken here on the woo woo categorization...but if prayer has any practical meaning for you, maybe reconsider the practical & spiritual value of voting for somone who isn't promising to give Israel whatever it needs to 'git 'er done'...it certainly won't stop the slaughter, but it might be beneficial in some personal way going forward...and, yeah, do what you can with your local school board & city council...they're influencable.)
Yes, prayer does have meaning to me and I do pray for the Gazan people everyday. If you have seen by Substack page, you will see my recent writings on the matter which appear to be the basis of Twitter blacking me out from even accessing Twitter/X. I opt to burden Kamala Harris with genocide now given the Biden Administration's support for Israel and her claim that she has been intimately involved in his governing decisions. (Whether that is true, or how true it is, is going to have to go unresolved.) Trump's words, I agree, were horrible on this recently--its the campaign cash. Not because he is a deep moralist, but because of his worldly, pragmatic view of building and dealing, he seems to be averse to wars. I think there is some chance that DJT, once in office, will pull the plug on bombing Gaza. I base this on the admittedly vulnerable conjecture on my part that given DJT's frank admission that, in his meeting with Bibi in the past, that it was DJT's realization that Netanyahu did not want peace when it was available. I am praying that DJT disappoints Mrs. Adelson. But, believe me, I am very aware of what we both can see as an alarming set of data re: DJT and U.S. policy towards Israel. See my discussion with the Academic Agent in my Notes section. So, for me, a vote for Harris is a vote to kill more Palestinians, Lebanese and Iranians (not an exhaustive list). To circle back to my original reply to the Conspiracy Sarah, the author of this site, TO NOT VOTE AS A PROTEST IS AS MINISCULE IN EFFECTIVENESS AS VOTING IN TERMS OF ELECTORAL POWER---THE OTHER BENEFITS OF VOTING WHICH I BELIEVE ARE REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL (HUMANS ARE ENCOURAGED BY GROUP EMULATION). Plus, voting, added up, I do believe is important in the collective count, even considering its unreliability. People and groups either not voting, or white women voting for Obama, unleashed a lot of misery--perhaps irreversible--on the nation. I never have much respect for the act of counselling others to not vote. I will save my strong words for that. Thank you infanttyron3 and thank you Conspiracy Sarah for this thread.
I respect your decision.
But there's also the option of writing-in the name of a worthy individual of your own choice to register a protest vote.
Yep, I wrote in Ron Paul for several elections for that very reason. My protest counted for squat.
Only when I finally stopped voting for someone to rule over me, did I start to feel what real freedom is supposed to feel like. Check out Gary D. Barnett's incisive writing on the subject, a real eyeball opener.
Best of luck, friend,
~~ j ~~
Thank you. You, too.
(But I don't need to stop voting to know "real freedom.")
Yeah, that's what I thought too ...
Write in for executive and legislator positions with no good options,
"I, DO NOT CONSENT"
They no longer have the consent of the governed, of We the People. We don't vote for puppets while being stolen from.
Want to really mess with their algorithms, return all you purchased in the last day, last week, last month. Imagine if only 5% of us did it. And then, did not buy for a day, a week, a month.