PART 1 As you well know, I’m not a doctor or a nurse, blah, blah, blah…also not a statistician. I am completely open to just being ignorant about this stuff. Maybe it’s well known that these things, like cancer stats, aren’t available for several years.
Sarah, I agree there is no legitimate reason for data to not be available to the public regarding deaths due to malignant neoplasms after 2020. We know they don't want actual numbers out there, because it would help establish correlation, which could then help establish causation. The data are being kept under wraps, but then there's this preprint. Not sure if you've already seen it.
It's based on crude data from the CDC (?) but only for deaths due to malignant neoplasms among 15-44 year olds (compelling data for that population) through *2022*. Pretty weird that even these data are not available to the public.
One of my clients is a major cancer center. Advancing age is considered the most significant risk factor for cancer. Anecdotally, I have observed an increase in the number of patients I do testing for that are under 50 years of age. In fact, I'm seeing an unusual number of people from 20 to 40 with malignant neoplasms of the brain, testis, optic nerve, breast, cervix. I have done no statistical analysis for my patient population, which is an unknown proportion of all the patients in treatment at this cancer center. However, when I see 5 patients aged 21 to 38, out of 34 total patients, that's 14.71%. Again, I have not analyzed long term data. Those numbers are from 2 consecutive days this month, which does not provide an adequate data set to establish statistical significance. It still gives me pause when considering that according to the American Cancer Society, only 5% of all cancers are diagnosed in young adults aged 20 to 39. I offer the disclaimer that it may be an uneven distribution.
I am trying to track this more consistently going forward so I have data spanning a longer period that would help rule out statistical anomalies and uneven distributions.
You've done great work, as always. One need not be a scientist, a medical professional, nor statistician to recognize a cover up, or to see patterns in observational data. Keep sounding the alarm!
An honest question. Would you believe the numbers even if you had them? After seeing the pcr shitfuckery, then pulling back and realizing so much of the data was junk, I don't know that any numbers, anywhere, are useful for much. Sort of a Stalin thing. "I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this—who will count the votes, and how." It's a womp womp sentiment, because, then what are you supposed to do? Just admit complete and total epistemological defeat, and give up? I don't know. Even that 17 million dead notion...who the fuck knows? I mean, who really knows? I've gotten to a place where I wonder "what if they WANT me to think a bunch have people have died, so they can use that anger for...I dunno. Whatever the next op is?"
But, then I take a mental tally of the people around me that have been hurt and killed. And it's abnormally high. So...fuck. Who knows?
Did they call it cancer moonshot cuz they’re fucking with us? Like: we didn’t go to the moon, but we convinced you we did. And now……here’s another psy op for ya? And when I say “you” I mean people who still believe we walked on the moon?
It isn't just the jab that is causing cancer. I was told by a woman who overcame pancreatic cancer by skipping the only cancer treatments offered, Chemo, Surgery, Radiation.
She told me then (Early 1970s) that Cancer would be 1 in 3 soon. Sadly she was correct.
We smell a rat and now we want to determine the truth ourselves. The truth is environmental toxins (Not Carbon dioxide). These destroy the immune system. These make people feel miserable and think that getting jabbed will help. NOT.
Great research. I think we should clog up the CDC phone lines this week and demand they publish the numbers. I'll look up the appropriate contact info tomorrow and share it here.
Let's remember that DARPA has been working with Moderna on mRNA Cancer transfections, they were in clinical trials in 2019. Create a problem, create drugs for said problem. Trust the science!
I’ve had this “chronic wound” on my forearm, about the size of a pencil eraser, that simply would not heal, for several years. It might dry out a bit, but not visibly heal, and would be a wound again if scratched. It would probably set off the alarms as a precancerous condition and a battery of tests.
I took 12mg Ivermectin for a few anti-parasitic cleanse cycles, and, would you look at that, it healed up, scabbed off, and disappeared.
Hey Sarah, to answer your query, THEY HAVE THE NUMBERS and they know what caused these increases. Just like they know why all cause mortality is "suddenly and unexpectedly" up 40% since 2021.
Anyone else wondering how we'll staff necessary industries when so many working age people are already on sick leave or ... dead? Cancer, neurological issues, chronic fatigue all make it almost impossible to work. Insurance industry stats for that age group are scary.
Aa a retired Oncologist, this is what I know speaking to colleagues.
They are seeing more and more cancers than ever.
Cancer used to be relatively rare in the young. Not anymore.
These mofos are aggressive AF. They don't respond to standard slash poison and burn.
Katie is in a shitload of trouble.
Pass the Ivermectin and Fenbendazole. Quickly.
Sarah, I agree there is no legitimate reason for data to not be available to the public regarding deaths due to malignant neoplasms after 2020. We know they don't want actual numbers out there, because it would help establish correlation, which could then help establish causation. The data are being kept under wraps, but then there's this preprint. Not sure if you've already seen it.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378869803_US_-Death_Trends_for_Neoplasms_ICD_codes_C00-D48_Ages_15-44.
It's based on crude data from the CDC (?) but only for deaths due to malignant neoplasms among 15-44 year olds (compelling data for that population) through *2022*. Pretty weird that even these data are not available to the public.
One of my clients is a major cancer center. Advancing age is considered the most significant risk factor for cancer. Anecdotally, I have observed an increase in the number of patients I do testing for that are under 50 years of age. In fact, I'm seeing an unusual number of people from 20 to 40 with malignant neoplasms of the brain, testis, optic nerve, breast, cervix. I have done no statistical analysis for my patient population, which is an unknown proportion of all the patients in treatment at this cancer center. However, when I see 5 patients aged 21 to 38, out of 34 total patients, that's 14.71%. Again, I have not analyzed long term data. Those numbers are from 2 consecutive days this month, which does not provide an adequate data set to establish statistical significance. It still gives me pause when considering that according to the American Cancer Society, only 5% of all cancers are diagnosed in young adults aged 20 to 39. I offer the disclaimer that it may be an uneven distribution.
I am trying to track this more consistently going forward so I have data spanning a longer period that would help rule out statistical anomalies and uneven distributions.
You've done great work, as always. One need not be a scientist, a medical professional, nor statistician to recognize a cover up, or to see patterns in observational data. Keep sounding the alarm!
An honest question. Would you believe the numbers even if you had them? After seeing the pcr shitfuckery, then pulling back and realizing so much of the data was junk, I don't know that any numbers, anywhere, are useful for much. Sort of a Stalin thing. "I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this—who will count the votes, and how." It's a womp womp sentiment, because, then what are you supposed to do? Just admit complete and total epistemological defeat, and give up? I don't know. Even that 17 million dead notion...who the fuck knows? I mean, who really knows? I've gotten to a place where I wonder "what if they WANT me to think a bunch have people have died, so they can use that anger for...I dunno. Whatever the next op is?"
But, then I take a mental tally of the people around me that have been hurt and killed. And it's abnormally high. So...fuck. Who knows?
Kate and family demand medical privacy after promoting vaccine passports for years. WTAF
Fuckery for sure CS. Great job.
Did they call it cancer moonshot cuz they’re fucking with us? Like: we didn’t go to the moon, but we convinced you we did. And now……here’s another psy op for ya? And when I say “you” I mean people who still believe we walked on the moon?
It's pretty obvious the increase in cancer is from climate change and racism. Duh.
Wow...we did it!!!!!! We got rid of the flu since 2020 AND cancer.....we're number ONE!!!! We have some clever folks on the case!!!
Good work!
It isn't just the jab that is causing cancer. I was told by a woman who overcame pancreatic cancer by skipping the only cancer treatments offered, Chemo, Surgery, Radiation.
She told me then (Early 1970s) that Cancer would be 1 in 3 soon. Sadly she was correct.
We smell a rat and now we want to determine the truth ourselves. The truth is environmental toxins (Not Carbon dioxide). These destroy the immune system. These make people feel miserable and think that getting jabbed will help. NOT.
"Where’s the ACTUAL NUMBER, assholes?"... "WHERE THE FUCK ARE THE ACTUAL NUMBERS?" - Just so - I wish everyone were as frank as you are.
Great research. I think we should clog up the CDC phone lines this week and demand they publish the numbers. I'll look up the appropriate contact info tomorrow and share it here.
Let's remember that DARPA has been working with Moderna on mRNA Cancer transfections, they were in clinical trials in 2019. Create a problem, create drugs for said problem. Trust the science!
I agree.
Just where are the numbers?
I refrain from my normal use of expletives...
Perhaps my attempt at being civil...
Not how I feel, though...
I’ve had this “chronic wound” on my forearm, about the size of a pencil eraser, that simply would not heal, for several years. It might dry out a bit, but not visibly heal, and would be a wound again if scratched. It would probably set off the alarms as a precancerous condition and a battery of tests.
I took 12mg Ivermectin for a few anti-parasitic cleanse cycles, and, would you look at that, it healed up, scabbed off, and disappeared.
I’ll keep this up.
Hey Sarah, to answer your query, THEY HAVE THE NUMBERS and they know what caused these increases. Just like they know why all cause mortality is "suddenly and unexpectedly" up 40% since 2021.
But don't believe me here's the UK data.
https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:sc:VA6C2:0b312bd4-797f-4fa5-bf98-1787a28d8987
Anyone else wondering how we'll staff necessary industries when so many working age people are already on sick leave or ... dead? Cancer, neurological issues, chronic fatigue all make it almost impossible to work. Insurance industry stats for that age group are scary.
OUTSTANDING WORK Conspiracy Sarah. Someone’s got to do it, right?