100 Comments

It has been a while since I read it so I may get some details slightly incorrect, but, in the book, The Moth in the Iron Lung, the author was careful to show how separate outbreaks of polio paralysis at different time periods had different manifestations. There were different industrial chemicals in widespread use during certain periods such as iirc lead and copper arsenate to fight moths before the era of DDT.

The outbreaks of polio almost always came not in the 'flu season' but in late summer, when fruit crops were harvested. The outbreaks never followed any epidemiological model and could strike only one member of a family or several with no apparent reason. I found that book to present compelling evidence that polio was always a result of chemical exposure.

Expand full comment

Yes. Sasha Latypova presented several articles relating chemical exposure(s) with allergy and anaphylaxis (anaphylactic shock). Much of her critique revolves around observations and studies by Charles Robert Richet (August 26, 1850 - December 4, 1935 ). Here are pertinent links: >>> The second shot, or what do vaccinators and sewer rats have in common? >>> SASHA LATYPOVA >>> September 3, 2024 >>> https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/the-second-shot-or-what-do-vaccinators

Anaphylaxis by vaccines - discussion with Dr. Jane Ruby >>> SASHA LATYPOVA >>> September 9, 2024 >>> https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/anaphylaxis-by-vaccines-discussion

Though her discussions revolve around 'vaccine' injury, there are reliable evidences that products such as glyphosate, fluoride, and other distributed Alkali metal halides have caused numerous disease. Many of these chemical agents are widely deployed in domestic water supplies. The medical "profession" remains clueless. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alkali_metal_halide

Expand full comment

Thanks. I do read her substack. Another point to consider is that the inventor of one of the polio vaccines, Jonas Salk, later wrote books such as "The Survival of the Wisest," "World Population and Human Values: a New Reality," and "A New Reality: Human Evolution for a Sustainable Future." Apparently, the biggest problems to him are human population rather than human disease, which makes me question whether the actual purpose of his vaccine was the same as the stated purpose.

Expand full comment

Unsurprisingly a Jew.

Expand full comment

Tonsillectomies quadrupled paralytic bulbar polio cases. One study mentioned is from 1938 so they have known about this risk for a long time. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1620872/?page=1

Expand full comment

I can't remember where I read it but I read that they promoted tonsillectomies by telling parents that their children would be unsociable without their tonsils removed. Just like sales technique they use to push psychoactive drugs today for things like ADHD.

Expand full comment

I found an article that confirms that! This was in England in the 1900's but no doubt American surgeons were pushing the same nonsense. They said that inflamed tonsils were causing TB as well. Full court marketing press to enrich the surgeons and have government surveillance over all the young kids.

"An influential ‘focal theory’ suggested that infected bodily sites acted as sources from which contamination spread around the body. Elite surgeons like the Cambridge graduate George Ernest Waugh used this theory to present tonsillectomy as a technological solution to apparent social deterioration. The theory allowed disparate disorders including physical and mental underdevelopment to be attributed to infected tonsils."

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5883156/

Expand full comment

The more I learn about medicine, the less I trust. I read an essay by Montaigne from the late 1500s and every mistrustful thing he had to say about doctors rang true today.

Expand full comment

Nice job, Sarah. I’ve been recording instances like this too in movies and especially Netflix shows for a while now. The predictive programming is everywhere!

Expand full comment

I believe it is subliminal programming, which is supposedly illegal. It has been proven to be so effective I doubt TPTB can resist using it.

Expand full comment

As one who ended up with lyme, babesia, bartonella and parasites,(and only G-d knows what else) after dysport and botox injections. And suffering beyond belief for 8 years now. Truly the biggest mistake of my life!

I was still asleep then. I didn't realize I was just a "useless eater" that needed to be depopulated. I always tried to be a productive member of society. I thought that my life had some value. Silly me!

Anyway, I just wonder how many diseases are spread in this manner?!

After years of glossy magazine covers and slick commercials telling me I'd never measure up...

Gosh how I hate that I ever bought into that BS!

I'll get off my soap-box now. Thanks for your article. I'd say you're spot on!

Conspiracy Carol

Expand full comment

Wooooow!!! I had no idea! Thanks for sharing this. I was shamed by an aesthetician for not wanting botox.

Expand full comment

Yw! Please tell ur friends.

Expand full comment

While the suffering is very real, the connection between lyme and babesia, bartonella etc is also just a theory. The microscope picks up fragments of bacteria etc in the blood and a connection is made that doesn't necessarily exist. The recommended treatments can offer temporary relief for sure. Botox is a toxin that can trigger neurological conditions, without bacteria having anything to do with it. I know people who've cured their symptoms with dietary changes.

I hope you find relief!

Expand full comment

After suffering for 8 years, I beg to differ! I wish you could walk a mile in my shoes and then tell me 'bout your theory. 🙄

Expand full comment

I think you've misunderstood my comment. I did suffer. It's the medical industry that had the theory but no answers. Those I found by changing my diet.

And again, I hope you find or found answers too.

Expand full comment

If it makes you feel better, depending on your age you're not yet a useless eater but simply a cash cow to be milked while still considered productive. Later, you'll become a burden and have the leisure of opting for state sponsored euthanasia or assisted suicide. Isn't the 21st century great?

Expand full comment

Needed saying. Thank you.

My grim conclusion is that people who follow media (including dodgy alt media like Rogan, Jones) are seeing one world and I am seeing another. Especially if the choice of media is high density and high gloss - like Fox or CNN with their mock divisions - there is no way I can discuss with them.

This may sound patronising or arrogant on my part, but it is simple realism. I do not see their world, they do not see mine. I state my case, because seeds have to be planted, but try not to explain or argue. I come from a close family and live in a close rural community, which makes it hard, but futility is futility.

Anyone who stares at flashing graphics on a screen is already a hypnosis subject and should be treated as such. Most subjects stay hooked way past the graphics. As with Hollywood's campaign from the 1930s on to get women smoking, our globster elites won't stop till they get lots of corpses. Then they will charge for the cure.

The only cure is to turn it all off.

Expand full comment

Amen !

Expand full comment

We have been subjected to subliminal programming as part of their social engineering program. We even have a strong emotional connection to topics like the moon landings and the Holocaust.

When the emotions take over, it seems no amount of evidence contrary to a given subject can overcome mass subliminal programming.

Expand full comment

I have always wondered about malaria and the parasite because when they suspect you have malaria, they take some blood to look for the parasite. That is a lot less vague then a PCR test so how would this work?

Regardless of the reason people get sick, I wanted to comment that they are now flooding Africa with a malaria vaccine aimed at children between 6 months and 5 years. Knowing who we are dealing with, I think the next pandemic will trigger much more fear because it is the (vaccine damaged) young children who will be dying.

Expand full comment

Dr. Tom Cowan has offered a cash reward for any peer reviewed paper proving any virus has ever been isolated. He has searched the literature himself and came up with none. If viruses don't exist, what the hell are vaccines for?

Expand full comment

Vaccines are targeted at people who think viruses exist (i.e., told so without asking for the necessary proof) and who then, through voluntary self-sacrifice, reap the consequences. "Viruses" are the lie that get people to inject themselves with toxic substances that wreak utter havoc on their systems, resulting in financial devastation/ruin and physical harm/death. I said this at the very start of the psyop in March, 2020: they are media-manufacturing a "virus" (fake problem) to put the fear of God in people (reaction), where the response (solution) is then to roll out a vaccine that will be the actual cause of various life-altering REAL diseases, ranging from pericarditis/myocarditis to cancer (in children no less). From start to finish — i.e., from inculcation of a lie via a "media virus” to the rollout of vaccines that bring on real disease – the entire charade was intentional, with the aim of harming as many of the gullible as possible (my own father included).

Expand full comment

Very nicely put. For most the proof is what they have been told; 'what about all those people that used to die from ...'. That is it. They won't look at the graphs showing the enormous decline in deaths from said disease before the introduction of the jab. They won't look at the sudden spike in deaths/cases from said disease after the jab.

Sorry to hear about your father, I also lost some people because they could not see through the deception.

Expand full comment

Thanks for that link. Watched the full interview. Very smart guy (Ron Piana) with a great life story and effectively “insider” information on the profit-over-patient model under which the pharmaceutical industry operates. (Total f-ery, as C. Sarah would call it.) His story about Avastin is probably typical of both the “hidden” data concerning these mostly toxic drugs, the knowledge the Pharma CEOs/doctors have about them, and the approval process they go through (i.e., where the drug company ultimately ends up just paying off the regulatory agencies).

So Genentec makes Avastin, which is a drug to “treat” cancer and promoted specifically for women with breast cancer. Piana explains that in the fine print in the product insert/advertisement for the drug, it says, “there are no data that show that Avastin increases survival or helps [reduce] symptoms.” That’s directly from Genentec, derived from their own data. In other words, the drug does nothing. But despite being initially denied approval by the FDA, Avastin later received FDA approval, primarily due to Genentec paying off the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the NCCN then influencing the FDA.

Profits from 2020–23 for Avastin, the drug that does nothing, were $12 billion.

https://www.globaldata.com/data-insights/healthcare/the-global-drug-sales-of-avastin-1127427/

Expand full comment

My mother-in-law passed from breast cancer. During her long battle I started researching cancer. I learned that the “standard” for a cancer survivor after diagnosis is 5 years. Not very long considering the suffering and expense that cancer patients must endure.

I since have learned that there are many effective treatments that patients are unaware of. In fact if you maintain a pH level of > 7.0 you will likely never get a cancer diagnosis.

If you test your pH and it is at or below 7.0, take ½ tsp baking soda mixed with water on an empty stomach twice a day. Test often and seek to maintain a pH between ~ 7.5 and 8.0.

Expand full comment

Interesting. How can one test bodily pH?

Expand full comment

Aporia: "An insoluble contradiction, especially in a text's meaning; a logical impasse suggested by a text or speaker."

In the "virus" debate we learned that "isolation" means "isolation" and "mixture", at the same time.

We also learned that we cannot know anything about anything, that's not scientific at all. And that logic is overrated. Don't trust logic. Rather, trust your senses and the information they give you about invisible things.

Science is about discovering what is probably not true, although we cannot be sure of that either, and there are many scientific claims that cannot be falsified because the Corporations depend on just-so stories like quantum physics and Darwinian evolution, and we are not learned enough to know, and have no license or authority to claim that science is yet another corrupt human institution. Let's not jump to conclusions or do hasty generalizations or jump on the bandwagon and start saying "No true sophist ever lost a debate." All that would be inappropriate.

And finally, in the virus debate we learned that simple reality (we are alive!) is not enough to understand whether a scientific hypothesis has been falsified or not. For example, we know that viruses spread by contagion from one host to the other because that's our traditional belief, which we learned as an obvious fact by a magical process called "enculturation" and no evidence from reality is necessary to support that because we are mere citizens and we wouldn't understand, unlike journalists, special human beings who have transcended the limits of human cognition and just intuit truths that are never absolute because that would be too arrogant.

Expand full comment

Re: "isolation" meaning "isolation" and "mixture" at the same time, there's a very useful sentence in Stefan Lanka's January 2020 paper:

https://bailiwicknewsarchives.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/2020.01-the-misconception-called-virus-stefan-lanka-part-1.-wissenschaftpluspdf.pdf

"...the dying off of the tissue streak was claimed to be at the same time the presence of the suspected virus, the proof for its existence, its isolation and its propagation..."

This simultaneous multi-purposing and interpretation of observed cell or tissue death is extended one more step, through the regulatory fake-science protocols distributed to manufacturers by fake-regulators.

It's used by both manufacturers and regulators to claim that observed cytotoxicity is proof of the presence of a disease-causing, stable, transmissible thing ('virus') as an immunogenic substance within a 'vaccine' batch and proof of its effectiveness for inducing immunity by disabling the same substance that the manufacturers and regulators claim it to be.

I'm not expressing that thought very well, but it's a very contorted thought to try to express and it's about premises that are false to begin with, so that's the best I can do right now.

A clunky attempt at an analogy:

1. Observer sees a living person spurting blood from gaping holes in his flesh.

2. Observer sees another living person carrying a bloody knife standing nearby.

3. Observer claims the blood on the knife and the knife itself are the same thing, and that both the blood and the knife caused the blood spurting from the stabbed person, but the person holding the knife had nothing to do with the holes appearing.

4. Observer then claims that stabbing the person with the bloody knife again and again will heal the original wounds.

Expand full comment

"This simultaneous multi-purposing and interpretation of observed cell or tissue death is extended one more step, through the regulatory fake-science protocols distributed to manufacturers by fake-regulators."

The preamble to this extension of observed cell death is that this fakery is taught to every medical student as fundamental truth and proof of a virus and evidence of vaccine success. Those students finish med school/ residency/internship, armed with the supreme confidence that they are the smartest smarties in the room, and go on to hold positions within both the regulatory agencies issuing parameters and as the manufacturers of the product. It's concentric circles all the way down. And up.

(Also, I think your analogy is good a one.)

Expand full comment

And the belief is reinforced by the air of priestly authority. The young students suddenly realize they are way up in the food chain, because so many unlearned people show fear and trembling when confronted by the privileged knowledge they have just acquired. They probably experience this realization of a pretty good social status as a high far greater than amphetamines. They're Rock Stars!

Expand full comment

Good analogy, yes.

I think what they say is designed to be confusing. To make a joke, one of these days we may discover that the first virologists were Jesuits or studied under the Jesuits.

Expand full comment

They are for us to see who is the strongest among us as dying is the result for the weak systems being vaccinated ( or breathing, or eating, or doing anything in todays world). God lives and he is not happy with how cheaply we sell our heritage but he is merciful enough to help out so the information to stop this is out there if we can convince enough others to pay attention.

Expand full comment

The PCR test is fdesigned or detecting specific protein arrays that conform with those produced by specific pathogens. PCR does not detect intact or complete bacteria or viruses. - only their specific by-products. The accuracy of PCR is dependent on the purity of the specific reactant on the PCR strip and the number of "cycles" employed to produce a significant result. The high false positive rate of PCR renders it as a first stage screening test only. Malarial blood films look for intact malarial parasites and according to the observed morphology can elucidate exactly which type of malaria is present. When found and categorised the malarial film is a dependable technique for confirming malarial infections. A negative malarial film result may occur at an early stage of infection when parasites have not yet begun to circulate in the bloodstream; hence repeat films may be indicated by recurring symptoms.

Expand full comment

To be clear, I am not asserting that malaria is not real, or that the method of diagnosis has been co-opted in the same way that other viral diagnoses have been.

As far as I could tell, the malarial parasites are able to be seen, which is why I included and linked the malaria slide. I really haven't spent much time looking into malaria, although I surmise that there are multiple factors that contribute to one's vulnerability.

Malaria is interesting to me because of the number of countermeasures that continue to be associated with it... and the clear assertion that "There is only one cause of malaria. The mosquito. Destroy the mosquito and you wipe out the disease."

Maybe that's true, but it's illogical and irrational.

For all the time, effort, and energy, the countermeasures appear to be failing miserably:

"According to the latest World malaria report, there were 263 million cases of malaria in 2023 compared to 252 million cases in 2022. The estimated number of malaria deaths stood at 597 000 in 2023 compared to 600 000 in 2022."

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/malaria

Despite decades of failure, the business of malaria seems to be booming...

Expand full comment

Maybe it is a bit woo woo but what if the repeated spraying of insecticides has sensitised humans to parasite invasion? I don't know - just sayin' !

Expand full comment

typo: ...designed for...

Expand full comment

Nice summary of PCR. Kary Mullis summarized its diagnostic irrelevance thusly - "PCR can't tell you if you are sick." Or, as it was grossly misused during COVID Madness, it would tell you that you were sick even if you weren't. We are constantly told Ask Your Doctor (pharma pimp). Doctor: "Get the COVID vax, now. NOW!" Patient: "I got jabbed and boosted, now I have a brain tumor and my skin is falling off." Doctor: "That just means The Vaccine is working! You're getting better!" BTW you misspelled fdesigned. It's pfdesigned :)

Expand full comment

Oh that my mother had had such insights. What she didn't know appears to have cost her much of her life, dying at 54 from cancer. I was born in 1950, damaged quite a bit from birth, and I am quite familiar with what was being foisted upon kids back then. I was brought up eating the terrible "kids foods" of the day (my maternal grandfather was a grocer), and having my own TV in my bedroom (only child -- my mother didn't want to risk pregnancy again after what she went through with me). I remember "healthy" Crisco and safflower oil.

I vaguely remember the "instructional videos" on 16mm film that we watched in every school I attended, six before high school. I also remember the DDT spray trucks, and my grandparents' Flit guns. I think my parents discouraged me from going into the spray from the trucks, although from a distance I watched other kids run along behind them. I remember kids crippled with "polio", c. 1957.

I remember receiving a number of vaccinations. I was an Air Force brat, and we had military healthcare, and I might have received more of those than most. I attended schools that either were on military bases or had high attendance of military kids and were partially federally funded. I remember kids hitting other kids on the arm after they had been vaccinated. Some of this is just coming back now. I hated those shots.

My parents got other things right, like refusing to let doctors take my tonsils, and not letting me grow up on rock n' roll, not that I particularly cared for it anyway. I was asocial, part of the original damage. I skipped the whole social scene at puberty. I preferred going for walks. I did have a microscope, though. My own puberty partially failed.

I wasn't aware of much in my earliest years; that began to come at age 12 or so, from a very messed up church that my mother became involved with, but that also got some things right about health and about doctors. If I hadn't become aware, I don't think I would be alive to write this now. I am rather surprised that I am. My cancer was found when I was 56, but it was not aggressive and I survived it and the treatment. I suspect my mother was given DES when she was carrying me.

I explore these things as a matter of survival, rather than to write about them, although I do write some. Some of what you wrote about here just came into focus for me in the last week or two when I saw the newspaper clippings of advertising that Agent131711 has been finding and posting. A few glances at those -- hard evidence -- and I saw exactly what had been going on in the decades before I was born, and the influences to which my parents, born in 1923 and 24, were subjected.

It's quite a shock.

Expand full comment

Thank you for this.

Expand full comment

Too much of their “scientific fact” has been revealed to be anything but in the last five years.

When they punish and demean and censor disagreement with their views — it makes clear my skepticism is warranted.

Expand full comment

Merely questioning the Holocaust can wind you in prison in 19 countries and counting.

Expand full comment

And now add 10/7

21 Jan 2025

Knesset passes law mandating five years in jail for denial of October 7 massacre | The Times of Israel

https://www.timesofisrael.com/knesset-passes-law-banning-denial-of-october-7-massacre/

Expand full comment

The irony being that we now have a choice of not just a measly one but three holocausts that are legally unmentionable: the Shoah, the "COVID vax" (joined by a host of others) and the Palestinian genocide. Self censorship is becoming a full-time occupation 🥴

Expand full comment

"Microbes which are invisible to the naked eye are the cause of disease."

Now they blame parasites for causing cancer so they can sell us Ivermectin and other toxic anti-parasitic meds, completely ignoring the very real fact that our human immunity has evolved together with these micro-organisms (also parasites) who play a crucial role in our well-being and health. Without these billions of micro-critters, there is no human life.

Some researchers acknowledge the role of micro-organisms including parasites in our immune functioning and experiment/treat with helminth therapy (acceptable name for parasitic worms) and get amazing results for cancer, autism and neurological disorders. If anyone is interested, this is the best source for research and personal stories: https://www.helminthictherapywiki.org/wiki/Helminthic_Therapy_Wiki

If you want to see a very clear picture how parasite load compares to the incidence of auto-immune disease, I suggest this link. The picture of the world map will explain our sad state of affairs in one second. https://lindseywellsnd.com/helminth-therapy/

It's tragic how brainwashed people are. A fakebook 'friend' started using Ivermectin a few years ago after a cancer-diagnosis. Now it has spread all over her body. Instead of trying to understand she was caught in the Tier II psy-op, she upped the dosis of Ivermectin and added a 2nd anti-parasitic, and I think I know how this will end. :-(

People will literally choose death before admitting they were caught in an illusion.

Thank you Sarah, great article once again.

Expand full comment

Dr Makis says IvermectinFenbendazole is healing cancer. I’m just trying to understand…

Expand full comment

Yes. And Ivermectin/Fenbendazole may have a place as an emergency treatment BUT saying parasites are causing cancer is like saying firefighters cause fires. Just because they're found at the scene doesn't mean they caused the disease/fire but perhaps serve a different function. Mainstream doctors are trained in mainstream medical school where students are taught the germ theory of disease. Just like taking anti-biotics long term have toxic side effects, so does anti-parasitics. You need to find out what is causing cancer before you can truly heal it....which often times is toxicity in one shape or form. If you want to know more read the links.

Expand full comment

I don't believe they're saying parasites are causing cancer. The mechanism of action of antiparasitics act in a way to kill cancer cells. Dr. Makis describs this in his talks. Parasites and cancer both live off fermentation. They are not one and the same.

Expand full comment

What a good mother you had!

Do not forget that in the 40s and 50s the Frankfurt School propaganda nonsense that the European Christian family with the father figure was presented as fascist and leading to aggression was also begun.

The cold war with hypothetical threats (created by the US) was created to progress to invisible terrorists and invisible germs.

Also, the assault upon the Catholic church started then. (See Whemoffs book, Vatican 2 and Courtney Murry).

And the United Nations became universal.

Academia was brought into service.

In sum, it was full spectrum dominance by the victor and only remaining power after WWII.

How is anyone or group going to dismantle the present system which uses the collective to fight the individual. The hope is only local communities of like-minded people who can resist the assault (and coming collapse) and not waste energy fighting the system in a far away place ruled by money.

Expand full comment

Your DDT/polio correlation chart is a keeper, a visual that almost anyone can grasp. Like Dr. Wakefield's MMR jab/autism correlation chart. For which he was viciously attacked. There is nothing the diabolical assholes hate more than truth. It is so common now for parents to say that one of their kids is "on the spectrum." The Scientists scream that correlation is not causation (technically true but strong correlation allows us to use inference to the best explanation) and More Research Is Needed. It is far better for parents to use their intuition and common sense, if they have any, in matters that involve the well-being of their children. I actually remember the polio scare. For whatever reason people associated it with swimming pools. Once we were visiting in W. MA and there were Army jeeps driving around spraying clouds of DDT. It appeared to have little effect on the mosquitoes; after some initial setbacks they shrugged it off. But my cousins lived there and one of them developed polio and another died prematurely of some neurological "autoimmune" BS syndrome. Just a coincidence

Expand full comment

In South Africa we were lucky to only have TV in the 70s. Despite that the message was pushed. Polio is the reason I stopped putting that neat little flea and tick remedy onto the backs of my pets, and believe me, it is really pushed by the vet clinics. I realised that if polio was likely caused by DDT, which kills mosquitos, then anything that kills fleas and ticks via the blood stream of an animal, can only be harmful. It saves me a fortune and better still, I know my little fur buddies will be healthier and happier.

Expand full comment

And now veterinarians are pushing heart worm medications which are just as toxic

Expand full comment

And we appreciate you Sarah. A virtuous circle. Bit like a healthy un molested molecule.

To extend the propaganda debate all films are propaganda. You have to ask yourself how you feel when you are watching and especially afterwards. It's an emotional rollercoaster. At the end you mostly feel relief that it's over. But who are the heros and what do you remember most? I don't remember how Bambi ended but I remember everyone crying in the cinema when his mother got shot including myself. That's what I took away. Fear and loss. So when my mother died of cancer at age 52 I never really got over it. Programmed? All films follow the same programme; fear, loss, revenge. You could argue that comedy films such as Groundhog Day are positively insructional... Live in the present and become a better person. How does it end? He gets the girl which is just a tiny part of true love. The real love story is living with the girl once you've snagged her. What if she then wants you to sit on the sofa, hold her hand and watch propaganda?

Expand full comment

Someone else just emailed me about the no-virus thing. Okay, the universe wants me to consider this. I'm taking a hard stance as officially a virus agnostic.

Expand full comment

A young shepherd named Covid attacked the giant warrior Goliath with a humble sling and a humble rock, because Goliath invaded his eretz, that Covid's ancestors took from other people when they invaded their eretz.

Goliath wanted to develop the land and build mansions, holiday resorts, with an olympic pool and a tennis court and a dispenser machine of cold cans of Mountain Dew, and lots and lots self-driving cars that could fly anywhere in plane mode and make popcorn. Goliath would only get a symbolic 3% cut of all profits. Such a gentle giant!

But the boastful warrior didn't expect Covid. How smart was Covid! A great strategist. Before he used his humble sling, Covid prepared the minds of Goliath's troops with clever propaganda techinques. Now, the soldiers have converted to the one true faith of Covid, and are prepared to fight all infectious diseases by upgrading their operating system. The humble shepherd Covid will only take a symbolic 3% of all profits from future mRNA pre-treatments for pre-diseases caused by pre-infections predicted by preternatural computer models.

Covid is king, but we cannot afford to live in the past. People have moved on with their lives. Everything is fine. Just the normal big contrails on the sky, and the periodic fires caused by stupid victims who build their houses in the wrong place. No problem! Everything is back to normal, thanks to King Covid, the humble servant of himself.

Expand full comment

🔥🔥🔥

Expand full comment

What makes Fuckery so attractive and addicting? I read somewhere that there continues to be vigorous debate about, whether or not, parasitism, represents the most advanced survival strategy yet to have emerged on this planet. Imagine if all the unpublished research literature from all the worlds corporations and militaries were published. We have a duty to endure through this dark, cold night. Won't be long now. Then Fight!

Expand full comment