Thank you Sarah, for being on your toes. You are certainly helping me learn to be on pointe.
Good research and, even better, great dot connecting and pattern recognition.
The patterns are the patterns, and the clichés, including follow the money, and all the rest abound. The 'the' have had great success in the past with this their now well established set of propaganda tools. And like woke, have a limited imagination so have understood: we now see you.
With covid I that that the 'they' have over played their hand and accidentally, hubristically, taken them from behind their, what turns out to be, rather flimsy curtain. Now we get to see, so long as we are willing to remove our glasses of delusion. Thank you again for helping with that.
I hope I am on my toes, and keep exercising my intuition and mind in that direction.
Wow, I am so glad that I've been able to be such an intimate part of your expanding awareness and experience of the magic of life. Synchronicities have been such a big part of my ability to be on my toes and to expand my awareness. I didn't know how valuable my years of journalling my synchronicities would be for me. And now they are spilling out to amazing people like you.
I am so grateful for coming to be your friend sharing this growth into awakening.
I finished Anneke's interview. I ... have ... no ... words ... to say how powerful, amazing and inspiring that interview is and how much she is. She is very optimistic! Yes, I feel the same way. And she is the 2nd person I heard talk about the Yugas(?), the other being Clif High. A fascinating idea about the flow of time. It does have some resonance with what *seems* or *appears* to be happening.
And, maybe a synchronicity: her guru is Yogananda. Until I visited my friends in Ajijic I had no awareness of Yogananda at all. He was huge with my friend Janice, and her guru. And he visited Ajijic in the 1950s and commented that it would become a major centre of spiritual light. While IT Teching at a friend of my friend's, I saw an actual picture of Yogananda on Lake Chapala, the lake adjacent to Ajijic and Mexico's largest lake. Life is magical.
Aug 3, 2023·edited Aug 5, 2023Liked by Conspiracy Sarah
WE REQUIRE A GLOBAL-EMERGENCY for the following:
Climate Change
Pandamics
Child Trafficking
Hate Speech
Disinformation
Domestic Violence
Money Laundering
What else?
The solutiion offered is always technocracy, without addressing the root cause and offering local solution's. Problem, Reaction, Solution over and over
I'm sorry you had people come at you for exposing this corruption. It is exactly as you say hubris, thought terminating cliches and false binaries. I feel like these people do not see they are accepting scraps from their abusers.
Great post, Sarah. I nominate you to lead a new American government department that would be in charge of cleaning up all the evil corruption in government and business and reorganizing them from the inside out. This department would have the same authority that the CIA, DoD, FBI and DoJ has to clean up the corporate world and all levels of government agencies. Let the Great Purge begin.
Thanks to your posts, I too have been reflecting and soul searching in an effort to know how to respond to the excitement of this movie release. I agree, the horror of child sex exploitation and trafficking must be brought to an end. However, I don’t understand how a hero rescue (and those that undertake this work truly are that) in pockets of the third world, as noble as that may be, it seems to me misdirects the attention away the evil that lays, quite literally at our feet.
Meanwhile here in The Empire of Lies, as I have coined our country these days, we have child services and the unaccompanied minors program railroading children by the thousands into the hands of cartel operatives and who knows who else, grown in tact men posing as women sharing the locker rooms (and laurels) of female athletes, porn available in middle schools, prepubescent youth being maimed, disfigured an emotionally scarred for life while the psychological/medical cartel pockets fortunes for pushing it, now these pedophiles want to normalize their depravity and be referred to as minor attracted persons... Efff that! Oh, and how about that Epstein client list? It doesn’t take a “blockbuster movie” to point all that out does it? And where’s the public outrage? There should be torches and pitchforks I say... and these monsters should be hunted down by “the townspeople” So I’ll TAKE A HARD PASS ON THE HERO MOVIE. Thanks for your thoughtful work in this!
"Meek began his career with ABC News back in 2013. While at the network, Meek won an Emmy award for his breaking news coverage of the 2017 Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando, Florida"
I guess the only good thing about conversing with people that have been taken for a ride, is that it clarifies how much of that ride I have taken, and also when it's time to get off that ride and leave the theme park. The question I keep asking myself is what can I do about any of this? My answer is to not get distracted and survive,as the last act of resistance.
Let's not forget that a significant portion of the population is now showing signs of vax induced dementia. Debate is so 90s anyway.
What's the saying... Only stupid people try to talk sense into stupid people?
"To understand how to deal with stupidity, we must try to understand its nature. This much is certain: it is not essentially an intellectual, but a human defect. There are people who are intellectually agile who are stupid, while intellectually inept people may be anything but stupid. We discover this to our surprise in certain situations."1943, the Lutheran pastor and member of the German resistance, Dietrich Bonhoeffer.
Sarah, once again, hammer contacts nail as designed to do.
Just a funny illustration here of the Hubris involved with some False Binary problems.
Errrrybody knows about the 1935 thought experiment involving Schrodinger's Cat in a Box..
The cat is in jeopardy because if an instrument inside the box detects a single atom decaying, it will release a hammer which will break a flask and cause the cat to be exposed to poison, killing it.
The big breakthrough in following years was based on the problem that until you opened the box (in 1935 there was a shortage of miniature electronics that would allow continuous surveillance of the inside of the box...for better or worse, there's no shortage of such surveillance gear any longer)...until you opened the box and examined the cat, you couldn't know the cat's status with certainty.
So, the idea was developed that until observation/examination of the box's interior was done, the cat's status had to be considered as unknowable/undecided...in a sense both dead & alive until somebody 'gets some eyeballs on that cat'. But, in an era before science became The Science there were a few twists and extrapolations. I hate to quote Wikipedia, but it's late here and they seem to have a sense of how strange a captive cat could make things:
"Fundamentally, the Schrödinger's cat experiment asks how long superpositions last and when (or whether) they collapse. Interpretations for resolving this question include that the cat is dead or alive when the box is opened (Copenhagen); that a conscious mind must observe the box (Von Neumann–Wigner); that upon observation, the universe branches into one universe where the cat is alive and another one where it is dead (many-worlds); that every object (such as the cat, and the box itself) is an observer, but superposition is relative depending on the observer (relational); that superposition never truly exists due to time-travelling waves (transactional); that merely observing the box either slows or accelerates the cat's death (quantum Zeno effect); among other theories that assert that the cat is dead or alive long before the box is opened. It is unclear which interpretation is correct; the underlying issue raised by Schrödinger's cat remains an unsolved problem in physics.
Even without the quantum strangeness, though, the cat in a kill-box is still a false binary. When you go to make the 'observation', at least two possibilities could have occurred, both of which involve someone breaking into the lab and switching out your valuable box with an otherwise identical one, either of which scenarios might result in you opening the box to find no cat at all or even a completely different cat.
Two very simple reasons why some human(s) might do such a thing are:
1) Your new, identical box was brought in with no cat inside, the original box having been taken away, and the cat 'released into the wild' by well-meaning animal rights activists. It could happen.
2) Similar to #1, but your new, identical box contains a scruffy, mangy cat that even you may find difficult to adopt and bond with...because your original box with the famous, and hence valuable, cat was taken by animal-nappers who plan to sell it to a deep-pocketed collector...oh, and they didn't leave the mangy cat for you as a gesture of cosmic balance, or as a sort of apology for swiping your cat, or even a consolation prize/insult for being dumb enough to leave your lab unattended/unsecured...they left you that scruffy useless eater because they're in the business of selling quality cats and the one they left you wasn't going to be worth enough to one of their customers to justify the time, effort, and cost of food & medical care needed to bring it to market.
Any resemblance between #2 above and what happens to children being trafficked is intentional.
Really excellent work, Sarah. Such interesting revelations.
From the moment I discovered the phenomenon of "controlled opposition" I recognised what a powerful force it was and it annoys the hell out of me how people don't recognise its supremacy as a weapon against the truth. I didn't really know much about the Sound of Freedom and even though I was a tiny bit kind of carried away with the publicity, whenever something is beat up I feel an instinctive reaction against it - I did even before I "woke up" but obviously now especially so.
As Madyson asks - why aren't the survivors' voices elevated? A documentary film makes far more sense than a drama ... and there's lots of already-done footage that could be included. As an Australian, I haven't really recovered from watching the documentary on Fiona Barnett, victim of a "VIP" paedophile network courtesy of her step-grandfather, whose main abuser was Antony Kidman, respected clinical psychologist with an academic position, father of Nicole. Also, ironically, that sicko journalist won an Emmy for a completely staged event. What a surprise!
9/11 is my special interest and the controlled opposition with a massive stranglehold on that event is really worth studying. Everyone jumps up and down about WTC-7. Hello? WHY did they bring down WTC-7 on 9/11 in such a self-incriminating fashion when it wasn't part of the terror story? Why did they SHOWCASE it from seven vantage points? As George Orwell says:
"All propaganda is lies even one one is telling the truth."
In no way do I feel you shouldn't have named your Substack as you have, Sarah, however, in general I avoid the term conspiracy in favour of psyop and certainly "conspiracy theory/ist". I just saw a person on another stack say he was happy to own the title but when it's a term devised to work against you then by definition it should be rejected. The thing is it is completely inappropriate for quite a number of reasons. If you're interested I've written a post, 11 logical fallacies unmasked in the use of the terms "conspiracy theory" and "conspiracy theorist"
Thank you, Petra. I will definitely check out your stack....thank you.
As for my name, lol...In hindsight, I would do a number of things differently. The Conspiracy Sarah name was tongue in cheek...because it was somewhat of a joke at the studio. I literally never thought that I'd actually have anyone reading my substack. It truly was a place for me to vent so that we didn't lose anymore clients over my incessant ranting. I would've chosen a different name, probably not been so forthright with my identity, and done a bit more planning. But...🤷🏼♀️ hindsight's 20/20, and here we are. So there it is...how Conspiracy Sarah happened.
CS, your Stack was exceptionally well constructed, reasoned and written. I respect and admire your diligent and thoughtful introspection.
Thank you, Philip. 🙏🏼
Thank you Sarah, for being on your toes. You are certainly helping me learn to be on pointe.
Good research and, even better, great dot connecting and pattern recognition.
The patterns are the patterns, and the clichés, including follow the money, and all the rest abound. The 'the' have had great success in the past with this their now well established set of propaganda tools. And like woke, have a limited imagination so have understood: we now see you.
With covid I that that the 'they' have over played their hand and accidentally, hubristically, taken them from behind their, what turns out to be, rather flimsy curtain. Now we get to see, so long as we are willing to remove our glasses of delusion. Thank you again for helping with that.
I hope I am on my toes, and keep exercising my intuition and mind in that direction.
Guy, I just read your latest essay...
It was brilliant. Truly.
I've come to expect your writing to be synchronistic in my life, and this was no exception.
Thank you.
Hola, Sarah.
Wow, I am so glad that I've been able to be such an intimate part of your expanding awareness and experience of the magic of life. Synchronicities have been such a big part of my ability to be on my toes and to expand my awareness. I didn't know how valuable my years of journalling my synchronicities would be for me. And now they are spilling out to amazing people like you.
I am so grateful for coming to be your friend sharing this growth into awakening.
I finished Anneke's interview. I ... have ... no ... words ... to say how powerful, amazing and inspiring that interview is and how much she is. She is very optimistic! Yes, I feel the same way. And she is the 2nd person I heard talk about the Yugas(?), the other being Clif High. A fascinating idea about the flow of time. It does have some resonance with what *seems* or *appears* to be happening.
And, maybe a synchronicity: her guru is Yogananda. Until I visited my friends in Ajijic I had no awareness of Yogananda at all. He was huge with my friend Janice, and her guru. And he visited Ajijic in the 1950s and commented that it would become a major centre of spiritual light. While IT Teching at a friend of my friend's, I saw an actual picture of Yogananda on Lake Chapala, the lake adjacent to Ajijic and Mexico's largest lake. Life is magical.
WE REQUIRE A GLOBAL-EMERGENCY for the following:
Climate Change
Pandamics
Child Trafficking
Hate Speech
Disinformation
Domestic Violence
Money Laundering
What else?
The solutiion offered is always technocracy, without addressing the root cause and offering local solution's. Problem, Reaction, Solution over and over
🎯
Let’s call our own global emergency to fight technocratic leaders that are eroding our freedoms and trying to make us sick and be slaves!
YES
Beautifully written Sarah.
I'm sorry you had people come at you for exposing this corruption. It is exactly as you say hubris, thought terminating cliches and false binaries. I feel like these people do not see they are accepting scraps from their abusers.
Thank you 🙏🌹
Thank you, Heidi.
😘
Wondering if the anonymous writer has the initials LC? But either way, damning you with faint praise. Yet not brave enough to post in public. Weird. 🤡
No, not LC.
It was whatever...I just feel like open conversation is better.
Also, there's a pandemic of memory holes, so it's good to remember what just went down 😂
Great post, Sarah. I nominate you to lead a new American government department that would be in charge of cleaning up all the evil corruption in government and business and reorganizing them from the inside out. This department would have the same authority that the CIA, DoD, FBI and DoJ has to clean up the corporate world and all levels of government agencies. Let the Great Purge begin.
Thank you, sir.
My pleasure indeed. 🌹
Why tell lies when the truth is more compelling? If it claims to be truth and it’s not truth, what is it?
PROPAGANDA maybe?
Thanks to your posts, I too have been reflecting and soul searching in an effort to know how to respond to the excitement of this movie release. I agree, the horror of child sex exploitation and trafficking must be brought to an end. However, I don’t understand how a hero rescue (and those that undertake this work truly are that) in pockets of the third world, as noble as that may be, it seems to me misdirects the attention away the evil that lays, quite literally at our feet.
Meanwhile here in The Empire of Lies, as I have coined our country these days, we have child services and the unaccompanied minors program railroading children by the thousands into the hands of cartel operatives and who knows who else, grown in tact men posing as women sharing the locker rooms (and laurels) of female athletes, porn available in middle schools, prepubescent youth being maimed, disfigured an emotionally scarred for life while the psychological/medical cartel pockets fortunes for pushing it, now these pedophiles want to normalize their depravity and be referred to as minor attracted persons... Efff that! Oh, and how about that Epstein client list? It doesn’t take a “blockbuster movie” to point all that out does it? And where’s the public outrage? There should be torches and pitchforks I say... and these monsters should be hunted down by “the townspeople” So I’ll TAKE A HARD PASS ON THE HERO MOVIE. Thanks for your thoughtful work in this!
"Meek began his career with ABC News back in 2013. While at the network, Meek won an Emmy award for his breaking news coverage of the 2017 Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando, Florida"
The Orlando Pulse Shooting was a HOAX
http://mileswmathis.com/orlan.pdf
So, is Meek really the bad guy we're led to believe, or is he just playing one on TV?
You could have been a great detective.
Thank you for that....I think I just have a high tolerance for looking. It's all out there in the open.
It’s always a good idea to follow the money.
Well done.
Just wanted to point out that I didn't even bring up your stack.
😘
Many thanks, TF.
Agreed, money, patents and dead bodies. They don't lie.
I guess the only good thing about conversing with people that have been taken for a ride, is that it clarifies how much of that ride I have taken, and also when it's time to get off that ride and leave the theme park. The question I keep asking myself is what can I do about any of this? My answer is to not get distracted and survive,as the last act of resistance.
Let's not forget that a significant portion of the population is now showing signs of vax induced dementia. Debate is so 90s anyway.
What's the saying... Only stupid people try to talk sense into stupid people?
"To understand how to deal with stupidity, we must try to understand its nature. This much is certain: it is not essentially an intellectual, but a human defect. There are people who are intellectually agile who are stupid, while intellectually inept people may be anything but stupid. We discover this to our surprise in certain situations."1943, the Lutheran pastor and member of the German resistance, Dietrich Bonhoeffer.
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/on-stupidity
Knocked that one out of the park. Well done.
Gracias.
Sarah, once again, hammer contacts nail as designed to do.
Just a funny illustration here of the Hubris involved with some False Binary problems.
Errrrybody knows about the 1935 thought experiment involving Schrodinger's Cat in a Box..
The cat is in jeopardy because if an instrument inside the box detects a single atom decaying, it will release a hammer which will break a flask and cause the cat to be exposed to poison, killing it.
The big breakthrough in following years was based on the problem that until you opened the box (in 1935 there was a shortage of miniature electronics that would allow continuous surveillance of the inside of the box...for better or worse, there's no shortage of such surveillance gear any longer)...until you opened the box and examined the cat, you couldn't know the cat's status with certainty.
So, the idea was developed that until observation/examination of the box's interior was done, the cat's status had to be considered as unknowable/undecided...in a sense both dead & alive until somebody 'gets some eyeballs on that cat'. But, in an era before science became The Science there were a few twists and extrapolations. I hate to quote Wikipedia, but it's late here and they seem to have a sense of how strange a captive cat could make things:
"Fundamentally, the Schrödinger's cat experiment asks how long superpositions last and when (or whether) they collapse. Interpretations for resolving this question include that the cat is dead or alive when the box is opened (Copenhagen); that a conscious mind must observe the box (Von Neumann–Wigner); that upon observation, the universe branches into one universe where the cat is alive and another one where it is dead (many-worlds); that every object (such as the cat, and the box itself) is an observer, but superposition is relative depending on the observer (relational); that superposition never truly exists due to time-travelling waves (transactional); that merely observing the box either slows or accelerates the cat's death (quantum Zeno effect); among other theories that assert that the cat is dead or alive long before the box is opened. It is unclear which interpretation is correct; the underlying issue raised by Schrödinger's cat remains an unsolved problem in physics.
Even without the quantum strangeness, though, the cat in a kill-box is still a false binary. When you go to make the 'observation', at least two possibilities could have occurred, both of which involve someone breaking into the lab and switching out your valuable box with an otherwise identical one, either of which scenarios might result in you opening the box to find no cat at all or even a completely different cat.
Two very simple reasons why some human(s) might do such a thing are:
1) Your new, identical box was brought in with no cat inside, the original box having been taken away, and the cat 'released into the wild' by well-meaning animal rights activists. It could happen.
2) Similar to #1, but your new, identical box contains a scruffy, mangy cat that even you may find difficult to adopt and bond with...because your original box with the famous, and hence valuable, cat was taken by animal-nappers who plan to sell it to a deep-pocketed collector...oh, and they didn't leave the mangy cat for you as a gesture of cosmic balance, or as a sort of apology for swiping your cat, or even a consolation prize/insult for being dumb enough to leave your lab unattended/unsecured...they left you that scruffy useless eater because they're in the business of selling quality cats and the one they left you wasn't going to be worth enough to one of their customers to justify the time, effort, and cost of food & medical care needed to bring it to market.
Any resemblance between #2 above and what happens to children being trafficked is intentional.
V
Great points made!
I think the grey area is what's hard to read with all this propaganda.
Like you, I see an agenda with this movie.
However, I also see that the publicity is a good thing, even if this movie is misrepresenting information.
It's like Malone, who I saw at the start push the jabs while pretending to be against the jabs turn into having to say the jabs were bad.
The truth shines out because instead of hiding the fact, now they have to address it.
They think they can control the narrative, but awareness of it opens doors.
Really excellent work, Sarah. Such interesting revelations.
From the moment I discovered the phenomenon of "controlled opposition" I recognised what a powerful force it was and it annoys the hell out of me how people don't recognise its supremacy as a weapon against the truth. I didn't really know much about the Sound of Freedom and even though I was a tiny bit kind of carried away with the publicity, whenever something is beat up I feel an instinctive reaction against it - I did even before I "woke up" but obviously now especially so.
As Madyson asks - why aren't the survivors' voices elevated? A documentary film makes far more sense than a drama ... and there's lots of already-done footage that could be included. As an Australian, I haven't really recovered from watching the documentary on Fiona Barnett, victim of a "VIP" paedophile network courtesy of her step-grandfather, whose main abuser was Antony Kidman, respected clinical psychologist with an academic position, father of Nicole. Also, ironically, that sicko journalist won an Emmy for a completely staged event. What a surprise!
https://www.youtube.com/@fionabarnett4738/videos
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/4o8tqf/orlando_shooting_was_a_hoax_full_case_report/
9/11 is my special interest and the controlled opposition with a massive stranglehold on that event is really worth studying. Everyone jumps up and down about WTC-7. Hello? WHY did they bring down WTC-7 on 9/11 in such a self-incriminating fashion when it wasn't part of the terror story? Why did they SHOWCASE it from seven vantage points? As George Orwell says:
"All propaganda is lies even one one is telling the truth."
In no way do I feel you shouldn't have named your Substack as you have, Sarah, however, in general I avoid the term conspiracy in favour of psyop and certainly "conspiracy theory/ist". I just saw a person on another stack say he was happy to own the title but when it's a term devised to work against you then by definition it should be rejected. The thing is it is completely inappropriate for quite a number of reasons. If you're interested I've written a post, 11 logical fallacies unmasked in the use of the terms "conspiracy theory" and "conspiracy theorist"
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/11-logical-fallacies-unmasked-in
Thank you, Petra. I will definitely check out your stack....thank you.
As for my name, lol...In hindsight, I would do a number of things differently. The Conspiracy Sarah name was tongue in cheek...because it was somewhat of a joke at the studio. I literally never thought that I'd actually have anyone reading my substack. It truly was a place for me to vent so that we didn't lose anymore clients over my incessant ranting. I would've chosen a different name, probably not been so forthright with my identity, and done a bit more planning. But...🤷🏼♀️ hindsight's 20/20, and here we are. So there it is...how Conspiracy Sarah happened.