Silent Questions for Quiet Wars.

Heal the Logic Divide

I write this as an observation of overlaps and gaping omissions. This is an invitation to release the paradigm of binary approach.

Us v Them.

Wrong v Right.

Pro v Anti

Medical Freedom Movement v Mainstream

Right v Left

---

A client whom I have come to consider a good friend, as well my own teacher, asked me a question yesterday;

“Explain to me why you think RFK Jr is bad.”

To which I replied that I have never said that he “is bad”. I hope he’s not. Truly.

I just have some observations. And questions. I believe that these are reasonable, and worthy of consideration.

Here is a statement from RFK Jr:

“It is dawning on mainstream figures like Anthony Fauci that their Covid policies were a public health disaster. Lots of us are angry about the mandates, the lockdowns, the censorship, the insanity. But we need to avoid the toxic quagmire of retribution and blame and focus on ensuring this never happens again. Clean up the regulatory agencies, get corporate money out of public health, and guarantee free, open, uncensored public and scientific discourse.

“Of course, officials who betrayed the public trust must not be allowed to hold power. I will remove them from their positions and, if laws were broken, my attorney general will prosecute.

Who doesn’t agree with this? Yes! Those responsible for this should be held accountable. The problem is that “the people responsible” are not individuals or even pharmaceutical companies. Please do not misunderstand me. There are plenty of folks with blood on their hands. There are plenty of people WELL AWARE of what was happening, while it was happening.

But they are the poster children.

They are being promoted as a target to place our anger and blame. However, this is a effort in futility.

“If laws were broken, my attorney general will prosecute.”

All of the fanfare about suing here and prosecuting there…sounds GREAT…WOO HOO….let’s bring some justice up in here👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

But there is currently no justice to be had.

And plenty of the people peddling this"GET EM” narrative, know fully well that there is currently no justice to be had.

For instance, attorneys running for president.

In fact, we can be quite sure that suing entities which we have been encouraged to blame by various thought leaders and intellectual dark webs, will be an effort in futility.

A fool’s errand.

A waste of effort and resource, a divergence of attention, and most importantly a psychological tool. The reports of being able to sue Pfizer, holding Fauci accountable, and seeing that Brook Jackson filed a lawsuit, land in the subconscious space… and on that level, make us feel like something is being done. Like a reckoning is happening.

It is not. And let me tell you why.

I will point to Katherine Watt and Sasha Latypova’s work.

Brook Jackson managed a clinical trial site for Pfizer. She is a whistleblower who was immediately fired after reporting what she saw. She then sued Pfizer for defrauding the government. The trial was dismissed.

Brook Jackson observed and documented fraud in Pfizer trials because all of it was fraud. The FDA, pharmas and DOJ were all in on it and DOJ declined to prosecute, then Judge Truncale dismissed the case finding that knowledge of fraud, while not disputed, was immaterial to the FDA decision to approve. That’s correct. Fraud was the essential part of this campaign to intentionally deploy this poisonous, cell transfecting, immune system destroying substance on millions of people - getting “access” to millions of subjects in an illegal medical experiment without consent. The criminals behind this - USG/DOD/FDA/Pharmas knew they will kill and injure millions of people world wide and did not care at all. They planned and prepared for it. (source)

The trial was dismissed, not because there was no fraud to be found, but because what is considered fraudulent has been made legal by OUR GOVERNMENT.

In other words: Congress and US Presidents legalized and funded the overthrow of the U.S. Constitution, the U.S. government and the American people, through a massive domestic bioterrorism program relabeled as a public health program, conducted by the HHS Secretary and Secretary of Defense on behalf of the World Health Organization and its financial backers.

A lot of things that once were federal and state crimes and civil rights violations have been legalized by Congress through legislative, statutory revisions to the United States Code, signed by US Presidents, and implemented at the administrative, regulatory level by the Department of Health and Human Services and Department of Defense through the Code of Federal Regulations....(source)

How can CLEAR FRAUDULENCE occur, with an alarming abundance of evidential harm, and NOTHING HAS HAPPENED?!?!?

The injections are STILL be recommended. Today. Right now.

How in the actual fuck did this happen?????

Well, let’s take a look.

For a full timeline, please see Katherine Watt’s abundant documentation here:

PDF compilations

Here are some highlights:

Six of the enabling statutes, in chronological order of Congressional enactment:

•1969 - Title 50, War and National Defense, Chapter 32, §1511 et seq. Chemical and Biological Warfare, enacted Nov. 19, 1969 (PL 91-121).

• This codified at 50 USC 1511 et seq. authorized the DOD Chemical and Biological Warfare Program, including use of human subjects for chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear (CBRN) weapons research and development; Presidential suspension of otherwise applicable statutes and regulations under "national emergency" conditions as unilaterally declared by the executive branch, including nullification of informed consent rights for human recipients of biologically-active and potentially toxic products; and limited Congressional reporting requirements.

  Subsequent amendments, often passed through annual National Defense Authorization Acts (NDAAs), 4 expanded components of the Chemical and Biological Warfare Program; redefined bioweapons as "medical countermeasures;" transferred many components to statutory frameworks governing Health and Human Services programs under "public health emergency" conditions; and reduced or eliminated most Congressional reporting requirements relating to DOD Chemical and Biological Warfare, Biological Defense Research and related programs.

• 1983 - Title 42, Public Health Service, §247d et seq. Public health emergencies, established July 13, 1983 (PL 98-49).

• A key turning point occurred in 1983, with Congressional passage of the Public Health Service Act Amendment, codified at 42 USC 247d to create a sweeping Public Health Emergency Program under the direction of the Secretary of Health and Human Services. The Public Health Emergency program at 42 USC 247d falls under Title 42, Public Health and Welfare, Chapter 6A, Public Health Service, Subchapter II, Powers and Duties, Part B, Federal-State Cooperation.

• 1986 - Title 42 - Public Health Service, §300aa-1 et seq. National Vaccine Program and Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, established Nov. 14, 1986 (PL 99-660).

• The relevance of this Congressional act for the production and dispensing of Covid-19 "vaccines" is that it set up a legal model and precedent providing civil and criminal immunity for producers, "vaccinators" and others who manufacture and/or use products classified by the US Department of Health and Human Services, operating through subagencies including Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA), as "vaccines."

• 1997 - Title 21 - Federal Food and Drugs Act, §360bbb et seq, Expanded access to unapproved therapies and diagnostics, adopted Nov. 21, 1997 (PL 105-115).

• Food and Drug Administration drug safety regulation, clinical trial standards, and clinical trials and human subjects protection (informed consent) have been corrupted under Public Health Emergency conditions, primarily through 21 USC 360bbb, Expanded access to unapproved therapies and diagnostics, adopted in 1997 and amended and expanded thereafter. The 2004 Project Bioshield Act amendments codified at 21 USC 360bbb-3, Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies, commonly known as the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) program, represent the key expansion that enabled the Covid-19 biochemical weapons attack on the American people.

• 2002 - Title 42 - Public Health Service, §300hh et seq, National All-Hazards Preparedness for Public Health Emergencies, adopted June 12, 2002 (PL 107-188).

• This Congressional act and subsequent amendments, mostly enacted through the same laws that developed the 1983 Public Health Emergencies framework listed at Endnote 7, expanded and centralized the managerial structure or chain-of-command, establishing parallel offices or directorates of "emergency preparedness and response" within Health and Human Services (Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response/ASPR), Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice and other federal agencies. Coordinating committees comprised of representatives of these federal offices are authorized to meet and establish supervisory procedures to direct, control and fund public health emergency response programs at the federal, state, local and tribal levels. These coordinating committees include but are not limited to the Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE), established by HHS in 2006 and authorized by Congress in 2019, 15 and other public, private, hybrid and quasi-governmental entities, including the FDA Medical Countermeasures Initiative (MCMi); HHS Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA); and the Medical Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear [CBRN] Defense Consortium

• 2015 - Title 10 - Armed Forces, §4021 et seq., Research projects: transactions other than contracts and grants. Originally adopted July 29, 1958 (PL 85-568) for NASA, expanded for DOD use for "prototype" contracting on Nov. 25, 2015 (PL 114-92).

• Reduction of Congressional contract oversight pertaining to procurement of medical countermeasures originated in 1958, if not earlier, through Other Transactions Authority (OTA), which suspends most normal financial controls on federal spending. Congress authorized DOD to use OTA for prototype procurement in 2015, by adopting 10 USC 2371 et seq, Research projects: transactions other than contracts and grants.

---

There it is y’all.

Pfizer sucks. So does Moderna and Fauci and Hatfill and Kadlec and Walensky and Trump and Biden and, and, and….chasing them is not productive.

AND…

If I can find this information and share it here with you, can I also assume that people thought leading the “Medical Freedom Movement” can also find this information? What about presidential candidates? I’ll answer that for you. YES they can. In fact, I KNOW that they’ve been advised of it.

So WHY is this not the talking point? That our CONSTITUTION is under attack. These are smart people with large platforms. And this is a REASONABLE QUESTION.

Why are people like Naomi Wolf writing this:

I knew this day would come, though. In 2021, people on the (evil, stupid, selfish) unvaccinated “side” would remind one another on social media, and in person, not to be too angry and not to give up completely on our delusional friends and loved ones and colleagues across the divide — people who were at that time being so very cruel and excluding to us — because some day they would need us; to care for them, and to help them to heal.

What do we conclude now?

That our help is needed.

That it is cleanup time.

That it is rebuilding time.

All we can do is prosecute the guilty, and bring information and comfort and aid to the sick, and fight so that what happened to us never again happens, and never happens to someone innocent. (source)

Should we mention the strategic changes to our constitution, Naomi? Idk, I feel like that might be productive in “helping” and “rebuilding”that divide. You know, spreading the word about what actually happened.

RFK JR:

“Not retribution, but justice! As President, I will direct my attorney general to investigate and prosecute every person who knowingly defrauded or deceived the American public about the safety and efficacy of medical products and I will obtain justice and compensation for every American who was injured or suffered the death of family members from those actions. As a presidential candidate, I’ll continue to expose corruption to obtain justice for the injured.

Great.

HOW?

How are you going to do this without even mentioning this…???

As president, Kennedy explained, he plans to direct his attorney general to investigate and prosecute every single person who knowingly defrauded or deceived the American public about the safety and efficacy of "medical products," including both the face masks and the so-called "vaccines."

He can talk all the talk. And maybe he means it….however, in my estimation this would indicate that he either hasn’t researched this history, or doesn’t understand the precursors and precedents, which is concerning. I do not think this is the case.

Just like I don’t think the thought leaders and dark webbers are laboring under delusions of achievable justice.

WHY ARE THEY NOT CALLING OUT THE BEAST?????

Dr. Robert Malone, a self described “deep state” guy….

The November 13, 2023 hearings are in the can now, and video clips from these hearings are circling the world. Unfortunately, the prepared statements were not able to be read and entered into the testimony due to time constraints and enthusiastic questioning by the Senator and Congresspeople present.

Therefore, for those who are interested in my prepared testimony statement, I have recorded it separately and provide both the video/audio recording and the written text below.

FDA has issued a categorical denial of adulteration and risk, stating that “no safety concerns related to the sequence of, or amount of, residual DNA have been identified.”

According to the FDA, “The claim that the FDA is required to take any of the authorized or approved mRNA COVID-19 vaccines off the market is false. With over a billion doses of the mRNA vaccines administered, no safety concerns related to the sequence of, or amount of, residual DNA have been identified. With regard to the FDA-approved mRNA vaccines, available scientific evidence supports the conclusion that they are safe and effective.”

What does this FDA language even mean, “safe and effective”?

The emergency use authorized genetic therapy-based vaccine products have been rushed through a highly abbreviated regulatory process, forced via unethical coercion, enticement and compulsion to be accepted, and predictably now we have large numbers of US Citizens who have been damaged by these products as well as the non-pharmaceutical intervention policies which have also been mandated and enforced by the federal government.

These damages must be acknowledged rather than covered up using propaganda, psyops and denial techniques, and those who continue to suffer from arbitrary and capricious federal policies must be made whole. (source)

Yep. All true. While evoking plenty of emotional feels, Malone’s “testimony” was actually not even delivered; at a hearing, held by a congresswoman, that likely was poorly attended anyway.

Regarding his “testimony”…

The FDA sucks. Yep. However, the FDA does not have to acknowledge these particular safety issues. The post market surveillance was almost nonexistent. It WAS NOT, and IS NOT, “part of the plan”. And I’m pretty sure the doc knows this.

I think it’s time to put the issues of the informed consent and the need to follow cGxP regs to rest, isn’t it? The FDA officials clearly explained here that the reason they went with EUA is specifically NOT to follow any investigational drug rules or cGxP, and NOT to provide informed consent. And it is legal for them to do so for EUA under PHE! (source)

Safe and effective isn’t required, and doesn’t have to be proven or explained by the FDA.

It sounds really good, yelling at the FDA….makes you feel like something is happening…changing. Healing. But nothing is actually changing.

Because of the very calculated legal, structural, framework that has been created.

All of this talk is just that. Talk.

The talk that might actually heal the divide, would include a broad discussion regarding the assault on our constitution.

The absence and silence of this discussion is DEAFENING.

There sure are a lot of discussions happening…why not the ONE that matters?

---

This is where I will add my own conjecture…just thinking out loud….

If I were a terribly nefarious evil doer and I wanted complete control, with the option to murder the world, I might see an accepted injection as a perfect avenue. I might launch the op, perhaps performing and making available table top practice exercises, as I release an injectable bioweapon for a fraudulent pandemic. The first round might be contentious. It might kill a lot of people. And it might also give even more people a secondary weapon that will continue to produce outcomes.

Like cancer. Cancer is considered life threatening, by the way… and I might be excited that there are already disregarded regulations and oversight, made available under Expedited Programs for Regenerative Medicine Therapies for Serious Conditions.

I might also be aware that almost everyone, even those pesky anti-vaxxers, will be effected by this secondary weaponry. Speaking of anti-vaxxers, it sure would be easier to control them if they would readily welcome my herd culling murder shots, let’s just pretend they are mRNA for now.

Who might ease the acceptance of this new injectable technology? Probably a well labled anti-vaxxer would be good. A known public figure. Someone who could effectively deliver the message that there were some real problems with the first round of injectable products, but the future may be brighter….someone who has a history of vaccine skepticism and a large following of anti-vaxxers. Someone who could speak to the anti-vaxx hearts while honestly relaying that he is not, in fact, anti-vaxx at all.

I hope this isn’t the case, by the way.

The fact that there is an ENORMOUS discussion missing on every available platform, with very little exception, is concerning to me.

Particularly in the presidential candidate discussion, and among those associated with his campaign.

---