The tricks propagandists use to beat science
A model of the way opinions spread reveals how propagandists use the scientific process against itself to secretly influence policy makers.
January 22, 2018
Back in the 1950s, health professionals became concerned that smoking was causing cancer. Then, in 1952, the popular magazine Reader’s Digest published “Cancer by the Carton,” an article about the increasing body of evidence that proved it. The article caused widespread shock and media coverage. Today the health dangers of smoking are clear and unambiguous.
Together, tobacco companies and the PR firm created and funded an organization called the Tobacco Industry Research Committee to produce results and opinions that contradicted the view that smoking kills. This led to a false sense of uncertainty and delayed policy changes that would otherwise have restricted sales.
Press release
Press release
2023-10-02
The Nobel Assembly at Karolinska Institutet
has today decided to award
the 2023 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine
jointly to
Katalin Karikó and Drew Weissman
for their discoveries concerning nucleoside base modifications that enabled the development of effective mRNA vaccines against COVID-19
((Interesting they left out the “safe and” part of the usual verbiage….))
Stockholm,UPDATED: Oct 4, 2023 15:00 IST
Sweden's Royal Academy of Sciences appeared to have inadvertently published names of three scientists it said had won this year's Nobel Prize in chemistry, although the award-giving institute said the decision was still hours away.
Swedish newspaper Aftonbladet published a copy of an email its said was from the academy naming the laureates as Moungi G Bawendi, Louis E Brus and Alexei I Ekimov.
"The Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2023 rewards the discovery and development of quantum dots, nanoparticles that are so small that their size determines their properties," Dagens Nyheter (DN), another Swedish daily, quoted an email from the academy as saying.
But Johan Aqvist, chair of the academy's Nobel committee for chemistry, told Reuters: "It is a mistake by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. Our meeting starts at 0930 CET (0730 GMT) so no decision has been made yet. The winners have not been selected."
Oops.
Press release (after their “meeting”)
4 October 2023
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2023 to
Moungi G. Bawendi
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, USA
Louis E. Brus
Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
Alexei I. Ekimov
Nanocrystals Technology Inc., New York, NY, USA
“for the discovery and synthesis of quantum dots”
They planted an important seed for nanotechnology
The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2023 rewards the discovery and development of quantum dots, nanoparticles so tiny that their size determines their properties. These smallest components of nanotechnology now spread their light from televisions and LED lamps, and can also guide surgeons when they remove tumour tissue, among many other things.
PSSST…..BY THE WAY….GRAPHENE IS NOT IN THE VIALS AND STFU ABOUT QUANTUM DOTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Literally not worth talking about.
What’s up with this Nobel Prize stuff anyway?
Here’s the institute behind the Nobel Assembly:
This whole outfit sounds pretty posh. Who funds it?
External research funding
Research accounts for 84% of Karolinska Institutet’s annual turnover, and the revenues for the research area in 2021 were just over SEK 6.3 billion. External funders account for about 53% of research revenues. The largest financial contributions, except government base-funding, come from the Swedish Research Council, the EU, the Swedish Cancer Society, and the Wallenberg Foundations. The public healthcare system within Region Stockholm is also a significant research funder.
US research funding at KI
Karolinska Institutet is the largest recipient of external research funding from the United States among Swedish universities. In 2022, US financiers contributed almost SEK 103 million to KI's research, with grants from both federal funders such as the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and private foundations.
Gosh, I wonder what private foundations might be funding the Karolinska Institute???
Bill Gates honoured with doctor's cap
Published: 24-01-2008
On Wednesday evening, Bill Gates received his doctor's cap, ring and diploma as he and his wife Melinda French Gates were honoured at a special conferment ceremony at Karolinska University.
Click HERE to see the expanded funding catalogue by Billy G and the Gate Tones.
Call me crazy….but I bet if you had some herd culling injectable bullshit that was clearly killing the world, it would be helpful to have some Nobel Prize street cred to offset those inconvenient deaths. Nobel Prizes are great cloaks of invisibility for murders. Hey, maybe John Pelletier is going to win the Nobel Peace Prize next!
Oh look, here’s this helpful study out of the Karolinska Institutet (funded in part by Billy G and the GateTones, of course):
Mucosal antibodies in the airways provide durable protection against SARS-CoV-2
High levels of mucosal IgA antibodies in the airways protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection for at least eight months. Omicron infection generates durable mucosal antibodies, reducing the risk of re-infection. These are the findings of a study published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases by researchers at Karolinska Institutet and Danderyd Hospital in Sweden. The results raise further hope for the feasibility of future nasal vaccine platforms to protect against infection.
“This is not achieved by currently employed intramuscularly-delivered vaccines. But the hope is that a nasal vaccine may generate mucosal immune responses similar to those seen after infection, and thereby block the transmission chain”.
The research has been funded by the Jonas and Christina af Jochnick Foundation, the Public Health Agency of Sweden, Region Stockholm, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Leif Lundblad and family, the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Karolinska Institutet and SciLifeLab.
OOPS!! Sorry about that whole staying in the deltoid “confusion”.
Intramuscular is SOOOOO 2021. INTRANASAL totally where it’s at.
Intranasal vaccination with influenza HA/GO-PEI nanoparticles provides immune protection against homo- and heterologous strains
Robust and broadly reactive immune responses were induced with intranasal immunization with GP-HA nanoparticles, conferring protection against homologous and heterologous viruses. With versatility and flexibility, GP nanoparticles can be easily adapted for constructing mucosal vaccines of different respiratory pathogens.
Well, SHUT THE FRONT DOOR. Graphene nanoparticles can be used to make flu vaccines on the fly!! YOU DON’T SAY!
I WONDER IF HAVING THE NOBEL PRIZES FOR CHEMISTRY AND MEDICINE WOULD HELP THE PUBLIC ACCEPT MORE HERD CULLING MURDER SHOTS FROM THE PEOPLE THAT BROUGHT YOU HERD CULLING MURDER SHOTS?!?!?!
Gah. Shut up, Sarah. Stop saying herd culling murder shots.
They aren’t herd culling murder shots because they LITERALLY just won the Nobel Prize for that. Duh.
Wow! Excellent syntheses of this clear attempt at another ruse to keep the sheeple blind and dumb. Unfortunately, the majority of the world is still 100% clueless about the "virus", the shots, the boosters, and even about effective treatment. I was at a meeting last week and one of the multiple boosted attendees got Covid--again, and was in the hospital for 4 days. He was given Remdesivir! He was so grateful that Remdesivir saved his life. Why was he in the hospital with Covid? Because he had multiple Covid shots! He dogged a bullet with Remdesivir. The other members were all talking about how great the flu and Covid boosters were going to be given together this year! I was incredulous and started trying to educate the attendees and the hospitalized member just got up and left the table, and the others looked at me like I had 3 heads.
This is excellent, Sarah. You laid this out extremely well.
The obvious questions in Accidental History which presented so long ago:
Wonder who funded the *Red Trousers Swedish Conference and if and what the red (trouser) lines of inquiry are for Global Covid Summit, (funded by Brock Pierce? Crypto Guys? Puerto Rico Summit crew still?) and if there are some and I suspect there are, then how these red lines are communicated to Bob Malone and Ryan Cole.
How was it communicated to anoint the Defeat the Mandates team who overlay with the PR Team and also the Ron Johnson Team of Experts?
Where was Yeadon or Bhakdi, say?
Do they earn a stipend for their efforts to spread freedom?
What is their charge to earn this stipend?
Is money moved into Substack subscriptions?
*I hesitate to bring up the Red Trousers as they become the laser pointer away from the funding and the apparent kibosh on Graphene Oxide discussion.
Graphene Oxide discussion also and splashy incident also diverts from all the other WHO revelations that Astrid had in the hopper.