MERRY MERRY Y’ALL!!!
I was having a light conversation with a friend this morning about The Day Tapes, Friderick Jaffe, Planned Parenthood, and the herd culling murder shots.
I know, I know, why so festive?!?!?
I’ve got no good answer, other than I can’t stop thinking about the fact THAT THEY ARE TRYING TO MURDER THE WORLD.
Anywho…my attention was called to the Jaffe Memo, which if I recall correctly, Katherine Watt originally pointed me to.
The Jaffe Memo
The Jaffe Memo is a document produced by Planned Parenthood in 1967 which conveys a plan to manage the US population. Not surprisingly, 1967 Planned Parenthood claimed to advocate for women, autonomy, and family planning too.
Let’s do a lil background coverage…
Planned Parenthood
Established in 1921, then under the name of the ‘American Birth Control League’, in the United States by Margaret Sanger, a proponent of birth control, and a member of the American Eugenics Society, which lobbied for women’s rights to have access to birth control methods and education.
It was a facility with the purpose of sterilizing women. Realizing that they wouldn’t be able to promote their agenda because it would viewed as socially unacceptable and politically incorrect, in 1942, Sanger officially changed the name of the American Birth Control League to Planned Parenthood concealing its agenda of population control.
The organization grew, and established clinics all over the USA (and has expanded into the world market), and is now the USA’s leading sexual and reproductive healthcare provider – and is the leading provider of abortion services. ‘Planned Parenthood’ has been the subject of intense criticism since its establishment, from anti-abortion organizations and campaigners, to those who have criticized that way the organization is funded, both by the government, the Rockefeller Foundation (a family known to be part of the globalist elite, and has funded ‘Planned Parenthood’ since its inception in 1921), and private donors.
You have probably heard of the lovely Margaret Sanger. You may remember that Planned Parenthood in New York is trying to erase her “inconvenient” views.
Inconvenient views: Nazi Eugenics
Just in case…
SANGER AND THE HOLOCAUST: Margaret’s Nazi Connections in Historical Context.
Margaret Sanger is a polarizing figure, preferably avoided to stay above the fray. Unfortunately, it quickly becomes apparent to the eugenics and Holocaust history researcher that she is unavoidable. She is present in some form or another throughout the archives that house eugenics and Holocaust history, largely as a consequence of her considerable talents as a political organizer and lobbyist. Sanger was one of various organizers that coalesced eugenics into a world-wide movement; a movement made up of a network of eugenical organizations, scientific journals, and symposiums. This network of eugenical organizations was the conduit through which knowledge was exchanged; knowledge about how to implement eugenical goals through legal means. It is undeniable that the Nazis transacted their genocidal policies through “legal” means, namely leveraging the infamous Nuremberg Decrees whose salient portions were verbatim translations of American eugenic legislation. The Nazi eugenicists had been the recipients of decades of legal strategies matured by their American counterparts; eugenical legislation specifically drafted to surmount the otherwise formidable civil rights protections of the United States Bill of Rights. This exchange of knowledge happened through the various eugenic organizations, scientific journals, and symposiums pulled together by talented organizers and lobbyists; one of the most consequential of which was Sanger’s vast network of eugenical organizations, journals, and symposiums.
Here are some quotes from the always delightful, Sanger:
"But for my view, I believe that there should be no more babies."
-- Interview with John Parsons, 1947"The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
-- Woman and the New Race, Chapter 5, "The Wickedness of Creating Large Families." (1920) http://www.bartleby.com/1013/“The most urgent problem today is how to limit and discourage the over-fertility of the mentally and physically defective.”
-- Sanger, Margaret. (1921) The Eugenic Value of Birth Control Propaganda, Birth Control Review, p. 5
https://www.nyu.edu/projects/s...
And then there’s this guy. Dr Richard Day. Dr. Spoiler Alert. He basically blabbed the whole disgusting murder plan back in 1969. He either knew wtf he was talking about or he missed his psychic calling.
Dr. Richard Day taught at Mount Sinai from 1968 until he retired in 1971. Earlier he had been national medical director of Planned Parenthood (1965-1968); professor and chairman of the department of pediatrics at the University of Pittsburgh (1956 to 1965); professor and chairman of the department of pediatrics in the Downstate Medical School in Brooklyn (1953 to 1956) and associate professor at the College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University (1935 to 1953) | New York Times Obituary, June 16, 1989
Tax Funded Abortion as Population Control
And this, back in 1969, four years before Roe vs. Wade. He said: "Abortion will no longer be a crime. Abortion will be accepted as normal" …and would be paid for by taxes for people who could not pay for their own abortions. ⤵️
⬆️ Oh look. It’s almost like exactly what Dr. Day said ⬇️
Just kidding. It’s actually exactly what he said.
Planned Parenthood received nearly $2 billion in federal funds, pandemic loans in three years
The Washington Times - Tuesday, December 12, 2023
Planned Parenthood affiliates raked in nearly $2 billion in federal funds from 2019-21, including millions in forgiven pandemic loans, even though Republicans contend that the nation’s largest abortion provider should have been ineligible for the small-business program.
The report released Tuesday by the Government Accountability Office found that Planned Parenthood collected $1.78 billion, or an average of $592 million per year, in federal funds during the three-year period that covered the COVID-19 pandemic.
Most of the funding ($1.53 billion) came from Medicare, Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program reimbursements, while grants and cooperative agreements made up $148 million, according to the report requested by Sen. Marsha Blackburn, Tennessee Republican, and Rep. Chris Smith, New Jersey Republican.
Now, of course you know I have to mention Billy Boy Gates and his buddies The Rockefellers. As you know, Billy G has had his hands ALL UP IN ERRRYTHANG population control global health. From Germ Games and vaccinator mosquitos, to largely funding the World Health Organization.
Gates
The Gates family long had an interest in the subject of population control and reproductive health. In 1998, a Salon report noted that Gates Sr. was on the board of Planned Parenthood, and Gates himself stated that his father was “head of Planned Parenthood,” a role which he described a controversial at the time, but “fascinating.”
Population control and reproductive health were both terms born out of the terminology of eugenics, the pseudoscience which holds that certain people deserve to lead while others deserve to serve, based on genetics. Eugenicists even wished to kill people they deemed to be of no use to society, and to spend world resources on the preservation of the upper classes, the rich, intelligent, useful members of society, instead of the poorer sectors.
The famous Rockefeller family was heavily committed to the eugenic movement. Rockefellers helped fund the Eugenics Record Office (ERO), and the founding director of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research sat on ERO’s board. The Rockefeller family heavily funded — and was personal friends with — the eugenicist pioneer and Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger. It was with substantial Rockefeller support that Sanger’s “Negro Project” was rolled out, with her professed aim being “to exterminate the Negro population.”
Rockefellers also sponsored eugenics studies at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute in Germany, including the man who later drafted the Nazi forced sterilization law: Hence, the family commitment to the eugenic cause was no mere passing incident.
Government Involvement In Eugenics
The United States official policy on controlling world population was called the National Security Study Memorandum 200. In cooperation with the National Security Council, The United States Agency for International Development, the US State Department, the Department of Defense and the Central Intelligence Agency, the goal was to establish a strategy to reduce the population of developing countries so that the United States could have increased access to its natural resources.
As a result of careful testing in Black countries, the conclusion the U.S. government met was that no country has reduced its population growth without resorting to abortion. With that information the government used Planned Parenthood to carry out the global abortion plan in the targeted countries.
OMG…what the hell?!?!?! Look at this…Billy G is testing vaccines in Africa?!?!
Bill Gates Invests $40M to Test mRNA Vaccines in Africa
'Putting innovative mRNA technology in the hands of researchers and manufacturers in Africa and around the world will help ensure more people benefit from next-generation vaccines...'
Not exactly the first time…
Controversial vaccine studies: Why is Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation under fire from critics in India?
Months later, many girls started falling ill and by 2010 five of them died. Two more deaths were reported from Vadodara, Gujarat, where an estimated 14,000 children studying in schools meant for tribal children were also vaccinated with another brand of HPV vaccine, Cervarix, manufactured by GSK.
Gah…get to the point already, Sarah.
It is my personal opinion that the vaccine schedule does not provide more good than harm, and it never did. I believe that the data gymnastics and propaganda fuckery that we have witnessed over the last few years was not, and is not, novel. If you would like to hear more about this, JJ Couey discusses it at length.
I’ve done a lot of reading and a lot of research to arrive where I am - this is certainly not where I started…and the intention of this post is not to debate that particular issue, however I’m including it give context to the following section.
Considering that our “family planning organization” has well defined roots in eugenics (confirmed by their homepage first and foremost advertising abortions)…
It’s not much of a leap to entertain the thought that our entire vaccine program might currently - and may always have been about controlling the population. Either by outright fertility impact, or by creating lifelong customers through adverse events that would likely be uncorrelated. Like asthma. Or eczema.
Anyway…conveniently, our Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) works about as well as trying to register for a popular core curriculum class in college when internet registration was new. VAERS sucks by intentional design, and has gone largely unutilised. Covid sort of changed that because adverse events popped the fuck off.
But they didn’t do anything to like, make it better… or easier…or more accurate, because, hey, they’re trying to murder the world and stuff and they don’t need an accurate clocking system for all the detectives out there. So basically, all that said, the data is not reliable. But it’s the data we have.
VAERS is a giant pain in the ass, and is the opposite of user friendly.
I linked all of the events I have listed below, but I had trouble getting them to work, so I will just tell you the parameters that I used, should you be inclined to look for yourself.
First I selected Symptoms; Vaccine Type; VAERS ID
Then I chose symptoms that clearly relate to population control fertility. And I selected all of the options. For example, I selected every option that included ABORTION ⤵️.
I ran one query for all vaccine products, and then one for just the Covid products, so you can see that they have definitely amped up their culling ways.
Now before anyone gets started on the VAERS isn’t reliable, you said so yourself, it’s over reported, blah, blah, blah…let me ask you this:
How many people do you know that have had a (likely) adverse event, gotten cancer recently, or recently died(suddenly)?
How many filed VAERS reports are you aware of?
Because I have a notebook FULL of anomalous events and I don’t know of a single one that was reported to VAERS.
"But for my view, I believe that there should be no more babies."
Margaret Sanger -- Interview with John Parsons, 1947
Total = 5,979;
Covid = 4,095
Total = 23,904
Covid = 22,495
Total = 1,125
Covid = 823
Total = 3,908
Covid = 2,523
Total = 1,813
Covid = 350
Total = 1,201
Covid = 230
Total = 303
Covid = 139
Total = 918
Covid = 668
Total = 2,598
Covid = 2,249
Total = 5,207
Covid = 4,467
"The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it."
Margaret Sanger-- Woman and the New Race, Chapter 5, "The Wickedness of Creating Large Families." (1920) http://www.bartleby.com/1013/
SANGER AND THE HOLOCAUST:
Margaret’s Nazi Connections in Historical Context.
The central role the scientist and doctor played in the “crimes against humanity, and more specifically, the scientific movements that were the impetus.
Great work Sarah...
I didn't wake up till they said they were going to use mRNA "vaccines", I briefly studied microbiology at uni and knew how important the mRNA translation and transcription process is, establishing cellular identity (what makes a kidney cell a kidney cell, what makes a heart cell a heart cell etc), so why would you interfere with that process by transfecting some random Frankenstein man made mRNA code? It is soooo dangerous in concept, let alone going through with this action...
It's such fragile system of cellular function and health ... A house of cards so to speak... Why is this the ONLY solution?? WTF???
There are no circumstances that could justify messing with your genetics like that, especially via an injection that could dump its contents anywhere in your body... So given I had not questioned other vaccines at all previously, even with my biological background (which I am kicking myself about now).... Your article rang home to me...
"It’s not much of a leap to entertain the thought that our entire vaccine program might currently - and may always have been about controlling the population. Either by outright fertility impact, or by creating lifelong customers through adverse events that would likely be uncorrelated. Like asthma. Or eczema. "
Absolutely... It makes perfect sense, unfortunately we were all born into this era of population control (those born late 60s and later), and had to start researching to know...
PS you're not the only one who brings this conversation to the Christmas table... It would be like ignoring World War 2 in the 40s... It's the elephant in the room if you don't bring it up I feel ...
Merry Christmas Sarah, thanks for all the hard work this year, you've uncovered some great resources and put it together well 🙏
Early in 2020 my son's gf was pregnant. The ob gyn told them from blood test the baby had a genetic issue. (I cannot remember what it was called but a gene defect that can make eyes far apart & the person extremely tall...). When they said we are keeping the baby no matter the testing but wanted to know- an amnio was done with inconclusive result on that gene .
That grand kid is almost 3 now. Perfectly healthy. I just wonder about everything now. After covid I'm so suspicious of the de-pop agenda spider webbing through all of our medical care. After ob gyns went along with experimental injections during pregnancy it's all tainted.
🙏
Thank you for all of your work, Sarah.