This is a follow up to my recent post regarding the “surprise” summer blockbuster (The Sound of Freedom) and the predictive programming pedophilia arm of the government media.
I have included several comments from threads following my previous two posts. These comments provide some unique insight and perspective that I feel are worthy of their own post.
I encourage you to read the comments and check out the links.
I still haven’t seen the movie…which makes a lot of people Big Mad. I get that. I was Big Mad about a lot of stuff too when I was confronted with the ways in which I had been deceived. It sucks.
Uncoupling yourself from an emotional attachment that you weren’t even aware that you had, is challenging. That statement is probably going to make some more people Big Madder. And that’s ok.
Maybe they’ll be able to suspend disbelief for long enough to read through to the end.
Here is a recap of the comment thread that began this latest discussion:
How (fallen) ANGEL STUDIOS came to own SOUND OF FREEDOM. Well, children, it goes like this :
Disney purchased Fox who owned SOUND OF FREEDOM. It was part of the inventory that came with the purchase. So, Disney put it on a shelf with a lot of other inventory from the purchase. It sat there for a while.
(fallen) ANGEL STUDIO wanted to buy SOUND OF FREEDOM and release it. They needed to find some money. They found an investor, a Mexican guy called CARLOS SLIM, who has deep ties to a drug cartel that also deals in human trafficking (as most modern cartels do. very lucrative. hand in hand "businesses"). More on CARLOS SLIM can be investigated, but its interesting don't you think that a man involved in child sex trafficking for a living would put up the money for a movie purporting to oppose child sex trafficking? Hmmm..? How do I know CARLOS SLIM put up the money? Tim Ballard said so on camera in an interview promoting the movie. I watched it. I'll come back with a link to the interview when I find it.
CARLOS SLIM gave (fallen) ANGEL STUDIOS 5M to buy the movie rights from Disney. Now, 5M is nothing. This movie cost a lot more than 5M to make and is a drop in the bucket to Disney, so Disney basically gave the movie to (fallen) ANGEL STUDIO. Disney never HAD to sell the movie anymore than you would have to sell your house if someone wanted to buy it. They simply sold it for a song.
(fallen) ANGEL STUDIO released the movie to much fanfare on Independence Day. High Holy for all the flag waving conservatives and people who love firecrackers. Right on the heels of a very trying GAY PRIDE MONTH.
There is no mystery to the real dealings behind the transactions between Disney and (fallen) ANGEL STUDIO. Five years for a movie to make it to screen after completion is not unusual. I know. I worked in film for twenty years. I worked on the Mike Judge movie, IDIOCRACY, and I think it took even longer to finally get released. It happens. When Disney bought Fox they already had a full slate of scheduled films to release that most likely stretched back ten years and had no room to release SOUND OF FREEDOM. Besides, it wasn't their movie. They didn't care what happened to it. They didn't block its release. THEY SOLD IT KNOWING FULL WELL IT WOULD BE RELEASED.
The entire "Disney blocked the release!!!!" hysteria is nothing more than a lie to further the agenda. An agenda that is riding on the backs of abused, tortured and often times murdered children. This is disgusting.
I know more about this movie than I ever wanted to and will come back with more because it's important for people to understand what's happening. Me as well. Because we MUST NOT CONTINUE TO ALLOW OURSELVES TO BE JEOPARDIZED BY SWALLOWING LIES. THE COST WILL BE SUFFERING AND DEATH. I know I sound dramatic but I know I'm not.
But in the meantime, Sarah, you are correct in everything you're saying about it as far as I know.
One new development to mention now - Yesterday, Tim Ballard resigned as head of O.U.R. probably because a criminal investigation has started in Utah charging Tim Ballard with fraudulent fundraising, illegal use of funds and misrepresentation of his involvement with Utah law enforcement in the arrests of child abusers and the rescue of victims. There is more to the investigation, but I lost track.
A good article titled TIM (CONMAN) BALLARD can be found at freepolitik.com by Rick Thomas.
Also, a YT Channel called LYNN KENNETH PACKER has years of grand jury investigations and more about Tim Ballard. The Conman of Utah as he's locally known.
You are primarily right that only documentaries should be made about such suffering, but every once in a while a gem is found in the dirt. There is a movie that got very little attention told from a small child's POV to her teenage years about her trafficking-
GARDENS OF THE NIGHT 2008 with John Malkovich and Jim Belushi.
It's honest and very well done.
Two solid documentaries (both still on YT, I hope..) -
CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE
BOYS FOR SALE
Just passing on what I know. I'm not pressing you to watch any of this.
Writes Peter and Ginger Breggin Exposi…
Sarah, Ginger here. Thank you for observing and calling out the realities of pedophilia and the increasing attempts to normalize it. Those comedians are disgusting. Our children are the most desirable for so many twisted and perverted urges. From body parts and organs and blood to being sex objects. The trajectory of a child’s life is changed forever through rape, other twisted abuses, assault and even exposure to someone who projects twisted sexual desire to a child. Modesty, privacy, purity, all are now ridiculed and denigrated. This has been happening with greater frequency and boldness over the course of my lifetime. Children deserve a period of innocence and then privacy when they are adolescents. Guidance from loving parents. Modesty and respect for their shyness and awkwardness as they navigate the early adolescence years that cause such massive physical emotional and spiritual changes. And parents need to be warned. There are predators among us and they are coming for our children.
Thank you for that, Ginger. During this most incredulous 3.5 years, I have discovered how fiercely protective I am over our most vulnerable; our children and our elders.
The vile filth that the youth of our culture are regularly exposed to his unspeakable. To introduce wildly inappropriate sexual content to young minds, and then offer agendas and mutilation as an alleviation to the awkwardness that is inherent and has been amplified BY DESIGN, is disgusting.
It’s coming from every direction...and people don’t see it!!
I was waiting for someone to pop in and admonish me as anti-something or sex-phobic for criticizing that cartoon filth. This is what my baby brother and I first argued about on Normie Vacay. He is quite sure I’ve lost my mind...and none of this is happening - pushing sexual innuendo (a generous description) and trans culture on our children. He was so angry with me...and was sure I’ve been “brainwashed by Fox News”, which I don’t watch, by the way 😂.
At any rate, even here, the space I find the most eyes open...it’s hard to show folks that which they do not want to see. Particularly if they have already been emotionally coupled to it, as in the case of The Sound of Freedom. And the emotional coupling is CLEARLY by design...which is why the partial truths become so important. And this is a tired old trick from the liar’s book...present a *noble* lie among many truths and it will be easily accepted.
Although, as our recent history shows...many truths need not necessarily be presented to incite compliance or uptake; be it injection or broadcast.
That is so significant, the emotional coupling observation. Crucial, really. It's how the pedophile keeps the child victim silent and in a secret bubble only the two of them inhabit. By grooming the child into an emotionally attached relationship. Which works so much better than force or coercion. That's part of what the movie is doing to its audience. Manipulating them to love it so they will do whatever the movie tells them to do. Like donating money to OUR. Like microchipping their children. wow. Thanks, Sarah. Much to think about.
Jul 19Author
Yes, Gay!! The emotional coupling is tied into all of it, particularly fear. The emotions and love that inherently good people have for [insert the manipulative pressure - grandma, children, health] are used to pawn them into the position of perpetuating whatever narrative or behavior is intended. Fear of hurting, losing, damaging, etc is such powerful fuel.
What an astute articulation regarding the movie...the movie being the abuser, manipulating through emotional coupling. The audience being the innocent child, trafficked into digital slavery by willingly surrendering their own children's DNA. All for fear of losing them to traffickers.
And I'll add (largely unconsciously), simultaneously being desensitized to the sexualization of children in their mainstream media consumption. I'm not entirely sure of the end game with that...however, my first thought is that the slow desensitization creates a less aware individual, that is less likely to notice when something is off.
In addition to less awareness, a false sense of security provided by say, the CHIP program, would further increase the potential for a child to be exposed to a predator. And as we know, CPS is known to participate in the trafficking of children....so there's the dual use Day Tapes showing up again. CHIP harvests the DNA (and I'm sure continuous biometric surveillance is in the not so distant future) AND simultaneously helps funnel kids into the traffick.
Just spit balling here....sounds crazy...but these days, who knows....🤯
I agree about the desensitization of child trafficking. On the surface it bothers me that the children in need of rescue in the movie are little brown children. That the rescuer is a big strong white everyman super hero dude. This next thought is a little ugly, but Americans don't really care what happens to little brown children in other countries. So, it's like they are cute little animals being rescued. Not blonde blue-eyed American children from suburban neighborhoods down the street. Not "real" people. The story in the movie is more like rescuing a darling kitten from a tree. So easy to cry over without ever having to confront any uncomfortable realities that the biggest problem with child sex trafficking IS America. Or the complex emotions and realizations that would undoubtedly engender. It would also make the movie much less popular.
Americans already fear and resent the brown immigrants and their very foreign-ness. Zenophobia. So, as this ferments in people's heart and minds, they may very well transfer this into cooperation with the authorities to chip their kids, give their DNA to "protect" them from the hostile foreign traffickers.
Tim Ballard has been promoting a software to state and federal law enforcement that track the chips in the children. The software is untested and it's unclear exactly who all the end users are. It was proposed and rejected in Oklahoma when an astute councilwoman brought this to light. I watched the video. Even if this software never makes it into computers another one will. Studies have shown since the large influx of funding to combat human trafficking began, it has increased something like over 500% in revenues. And that's only over the span of a relatively few years.
So, IMO, your spitball ideas are rapidly becoming a reality. And, of course, once they get the children chipped it won't be long that grandma follows and so forth. Also, these chips are carcinogenic and lead to other illnesses as is known from chipping pets all these years. Which is what they want us to become.
There is an old song, WE'LL MAKE GREAT PETS by Porno For Pyros, that I like in a twisted way. Who knew...
I watched the standup crap. It's sick how they slide it in without any fanfare. Thanks for posting it.
ADD ON : It hit me in reference to the emotional coupling of the movie to its audience and my analogy of the rescued little brown children being like a kitten in a tree. That's one of the oldest ploys in the pedophile handbook. Lure the child with a cute pet or a lost pet. In the movie it's both.
Clintons Haiti Trafficking Laura Silsby: https://www.bitchute.com/video/gXiSQTKeyBQ/
The connection between NCMEC, Polaris, Clinton Foundation, Sound of Freedom, and the Flynn network.
Be forewarned that none of these darker topics are addressed in this film, nor is there any real call to ΑΧΤΙΟΝ to Αrrest "ze" ΡΕD0Ζ, so normali3ing kinderenTraffikkinggg... ΑMAZING Ρ0LLΥ ΝΑΜΕS the ΝΑΜΕS: SirVirgin,CIeentons, 0ρrahhh, Meeed0NNα, ΜκΚαinsss of Ari3ona, "ze" M0rrm0ns, ΡΕΤΑΗ-ΤΗΙΕL & then some.. https://www.bitchute.com/video/QQI2lCqAcQ9V/
Shared this a couple times over in sageland. Heavy.
Stay on your toes, friends.
They are coming for our kids.
And should you feel so inclined to buy me a ko-fi…I’m raising money to send my kiddos to skate camp, which is simply out of the budget this summer.
Many thanks.
Thank you for sharing this Sarah. Lots of great comments. It's all so painful and frustrating. I couldn't watch any of it. Not the movie, the comedians. Now that I hear all the comments it seems like virtue signaling to help usher in the NWO. It's the tip of the iceberg meant to distract us, polarize us, and numb us from the evil all around.
Isnt it strange how some people are triggered to complacency, lying to themselves this is only a rare one off, others, like us, become less trusting of everything around us and see it for what it is. The tip of the iceberg. A means of distracting from the bigger picture.
Sorry this comment is nothing new just want you to know I understand and feel you. I appreciate hearing everyone's views and input.
Ps hopefully this is legible and makes sense. So tired and can hardly see my screen. I just wanted to support you in this. I love your posts, your passion, love, commitment. Xoxo
I missed this insight. It’s so true and a brilliant analogy. I’d like to say thanks, but the movies virtue signalling marketing campaign makes me sick to my stomach.