Discussion about this post

User's avatar
TnDoc's avatar

This Bay Briefing just popped up in my inbox:

"S.F. is the first California city to report bird flu in wastewater

By Kellie Hwang

Good evening, Bay Area. It’s Monday, June 3, and California’s heat wave starts tomorrow. Here’s what you need to know about the news today.

 Virus detected

Authorities announced today that two chickens at a live bird market in San Francisco tested positive for H5N1 avian flu last month. It was found during routine monitoring by the California Department of Food and Agriculture.

“The most important thing to note is there is no threat to public health at this time,” said Dr. George Han, the director of Communicable Disease Prevention and Control at the San Francisco Department of Public Health. “There have been no human cases.”

Health officials said market employees who had contact with the infected chickens were closely monitored, and after 10 days, none reported any symptoms. No public exposure occurred, and the market has since reopened safely.

In response to the detection, WastewaterSCAN began testing the city's wastewater, initially detecting fragments of H5N1 genetic material. This makes San Francisco the only municipality in California with a positive avian flu detection."

Looks like "They" are going with bird flu... Thank heavens our loving USG ALREADY has ordered and stocked appropriate vaxxx.

Look for New York as the next totalitarian state to have a bird flu issue.

John H.'s avatar

This was an outstanding post, Sarah.

Some food for thought:

Dr PM is a clinician, not a basic science researcher. His subspecialty is non-interventional cardiology with a master’s degree in public health. He appears to have no actual working knowledge of molecular biology, drug or biological product design/development or in the laboratory setting. The payments documented here would therefore appear to be for the purpose of marketing potential or new products in his capacity as a well-recognized public medical spokesperson.

As far as I can ascertain, Dr PM has never addressed the plethora of reports from independent researchers who proved that there is only trivial (or none) amounts of nitrogen or phosphorus present in any of the 4 major CV19 “vaccines" they examined. That means there is likely minimal to no mRNA present in any of them, (if the vials studied are representative of the total universe of manufactured product). It is highly improbable on the basis of chance alone, that all the vials analyzed independently, would fail to contain nitrogen or phosphorus unless that was the intent. On the other hand, there are multiple substances in them which are toxic to humans. If I am wrong about any of these assertions, I am willing to amend my comments.

Then there is this:

If pathological viruses don’t exist (which seems increasingly likely), there can’t be any bird flu. In the unlikely circumstance that bird flu actually exists but can’t be diagnosed with PCR tests (PCR was proven to be an unreliable diagnostic test for CV19), bird flu can’t be diagnosed reliably. If that’s true, there is no medical indication for SiRNA’s or an mRNA “vaccine” for this alleged disease. The fundamental underlying assumptions upon which this new treatment is based, are either extremely doubtful or false. Anyone making such claims is at the least, highly suspect.

Moreover, when you see words/phrases like “seem effective", realize you are being subjected to propaganda since they are not valid medical or scientific terms. Recall that the CV19 "vaccines" were said to be "safe and effective" not seemingly so, and yet, they have been proven to be dangerous. It is wise to dismiss such efficacy claims entirely, unless and until they can be properly/independently verified. I am willing to reconsider any of the above assertions if presented with contrary/rigorous evidence.

178 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?